header advert
Bone & Joint Research Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Bone & Joint Research

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Bone & Joint Research at:

Loading...

Loading...

Open Access

Knee

The influence of a calcium sulphate bone void filler on the third-body damage and polyethylene wear of total knee arthroplasty



Download PDF

Abstract

Objectives

Bone void fillers are increasingly being used for dead space management in arthroplasty revision surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of calcium sulphate bone void filler (CS-BVF) on the damage and wear of total knee arthroplasty using experimental wear simulation.

Methods

A total of 18 fixed-bearing U2 total knee arthroplasty system implants (United Orthopedic Corp., Hsinchu, Taiwan) were used. Implants challenged with CS-BVF were compared with new implants (negative controls) and those intentionally scratched with a diamond stylus (positive controls) representative of severe surface damage (n = 6 for each experimental group). Three million cycles (MC) of experimental simulation were carried out to simulate a walking gait cycle. Wear of the ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tibial inserts was measured gravimetrically, and damage to articulating surfaces was assessed using profilometry.

Results

There was no significant difference (p  >  0.05) between the wear rate of implants challenged with CS-BVF (3.3 mm3/MC (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8 to 4.8)) and the wear rate of those not challenged (2.8 mm3/MC (95% CI 1.3 to 4.3)). However, scratching the cobalt-chrome (CoCr) significantly (p < 0.001) increased the wear rate (20.6 mm3/MC (95% CI 15.5 to 25.7)). The mean surface roughness of implants challenged with CS-BVF was equivalent to negative controls both after damage simulation (p = 0.98) and at the conclusion of the study (p = 0.28).

Conclusion

When used close to articulating surfaces, a low-hardness, high-purity CS-BVF had no influence on wear. When trapped between the articulating surfaces of a total knee arthroplasty, CS-BVF did not scratch the surface of CoCr femoral components, nor did it increase the wear of UHMWPE tibial inserts compared with undamaged negative controls.

Cite this article: R. M. Cowie, S. S. Aiken, J. J. Cooper, L. M. Jennings. The influence of a calcium sulphate bone void filler on the third-body damage and polyethylene wear of total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:65–72. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.82.BJR-2018-0146.R1.

Article focus

  • The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of third-body wear with synthetically manufactured grade calcium sulphate bone void filler (CS-BVF) on a total knee arthroplasty.

  • The wear of implants damaged with the CS-BVF were compared with negative controls tested in a clean environment and positive controls where the implant had been scratched to represent severe third-body damage.

  • The change in surface topography of the cobalt-chrome femoral components and the wear of the ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tibial components were assessed.

Key messages

  • Simulating third-body damage with synthetically manufactured CS-BVF did not significantly change the mean surface roughness of cobalt-chrome femoral components compared with negative controls.

  • Third-body wear simulation with synthetically manufactured CS-BVF did not elevate the wear of UHMWPE tibial components compared with negative (unscratched) controls.

  • Scratching cobalt chrome femoral components to represent severe third-body damage significantly increased UHMWPE wear compared with unscratched (negative) controls tested in a clean environment.

Strengths and limitations

  • This is the first study to investigate the influence of third-body wear by CS-BVF in a whole knee joint simulation study.

  • Implants damaged with CS-BVF have been directly compared with both new implants and those damaged to represent severe third-body damage.

  • Caution should be taken in the clinical interpretation of these findings, which may not necessarily translate to all bone void filler materials.

Introduction

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a highly successful procedure to restore joint function and reduce pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Despite a long-term survivorship of > 95% at ten years,1 infection is the primary cause for revision within the first year of implantation,1 and infection rates are rising.2 In 2005, infection accounted for 3.5% of all single-stage revision knee procedures,3 increasing to 5.3% by 2015.1 Superficial infection is often treated using systemic antibiotics; deep infection, however, usually requires surgical intervention including debridement and washout, often necessitating revision of the implant.4 Extensive debridement of infected or necrotic tissue can result in dead space, which can provide a potential source of reinfection. Strategies for dead space management must therefore be considered. Allografts and a variety of synthetic materials including non-degradable bone cement, and resorbable materials such as hydroxyapatite, collagen, fibrin, polylactides, calcium phosphate, and calcium sulphate have been used.5 Due to the presence of infection, clinicians frequently combine these void fillers with antibiotics to enable the release of elevated levels of antibiotic at the surgical site.6-10

The presence of loose particles around a TKA means there is potential for them to become entrained between articulating surfaces acting as third-body particles. Retrieval studies of TKAs have shown particles such as bone fragments, bone cement, and porous-coating beads embedded in the polyethylene tibial component; where these particles have articulated against cobalt chrome (CoCr) femoral components, linear scratches have been observed on the implants.11,12 Experimental wear simulation has shown that counterface roughness has a strong influence on the wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), and scratches to CoCr counterfaces with a lip height as low as 1 µm can influence UHMWPE wear rate.13 The directionality of the scratches, relative areas of contact, and the lip height of the scratches all influence the severity of polyethylene wear, therefore more thorough investigations on the effects of third-body particles are required.

Previous experimental studies have replicated third-body wear in total joint arthroplasty either by introducing third-body particles into the lubricant14 or by scratching the metallic surface of implants directly.15 There are advantages and limitations to both methods, therefore the method adopted should be determined by the research question. Considering third-body wear of TKAs, Ries et al16 tumbled CoCr knee femoral components with alumina to create a roughened surface with a random orientation of scratches. This method of damage simulation elevated UHMWPE wear ten-fold.16 The introduction of cement particles between the articulating surfaces of a TKA or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has been shown to increase the wear rate of metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) implants and to scratch CoCr femoral components.17,18 The small number of studies carried out suggest that the type of particles (e.g. poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) cement or bone) and their abrasiveness have more influence on UHMWPE wear than particle size.

When replicating third-body damage in vitro with particles, a number of difficulties must be overcome. First, controlling the number of particles trapped between the articulating surfaces is difficult, especially with the low-conforming nature of TKA and the tendency for the lubricant to agitate the particles, washing them away from the articulating surfaces. Zietz et al17 overcame this problem by adding particles of bone cement to tibial components, running the simulator without lubricant to create damage, before adding the lubricant and continuing the wear test. Dosing of the lubricant with particles was carried out to replicate the extended duration the non-resorbable cement particles would be present in the joint. In MoP implants, difficulties can also be encountered in assessing wear gravimetrically due to the potential for particles to become embedded in the polyethylene.17

The third-body particle of interest in this study was a calcium sulphate bone void filler (CS-BVF) used for dead space management in arthroplasty surgery, which typically resorbs within six to eight weeks.19 The influence of calcium sulphate on third-body wear has been previously investigated in the hip20 and in simple geometry pin-on-plate/pin-on-disc studies.21,22 In all studies, calcium sulphate did not scratch the surface of CoCr counterfaces with a lip height of sufficient magnitude to influence polyethylene wear rate. The hip simulation study, however, showed an elevated wear rate while calcium sulphate was present in the lubricant.20 The pin-on-plate study by Cowie et al21 compared calcium sulphate products of similar composition differing by the processing route of the base material and therefore their purity. Hard earth impurities in one of the calcium sulphates tested were thought to contribute to scratching of CoCr counterfaces, although the lip height of the scratches was not of sufficient magnitude to influence polyethylene wear. However, these tests were carried out in a simple geometric configuration and over a relatively short duration.21

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of CS-BVF on the third-body wear of TKAs using experimental simulation. The implications to the wear of the UHMWPE tibial component and the surface topography of the CoCr femoral components were considered if loose beads of CS-BVFs acting as third-body particles were to become trapped between the articulating surfaces. It was hypothesized that CoCr would not be scratched sufficiently by the CS-BVFs to influence the wear of UHMWPE tibial components.

Materials and Methods

Materials

The third-body particles were hemispherical beads, 3 mm in diameter, prepared from commercially available CS-BVF (Stimulan Rapid Cure; Biocomposites Ltd, Keele, United Kingdom) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. This is a clinically used, fully absorbable pharmaceutical grade of calcium sulphate, manufactured via a synthetic route.23 The CS-BVF was supplied as a calcium sulphate hemihydrate powder, which was combined with the mixing solution provided (water) to form a paste. The paste was then transferred to the bead mat supplied, which can be used to make hemispherical beads in three different diameters: 3 mm, 4.8 mm, and 6 mm. The 3 mm diameter beads were selected for this study. Once the beads were set (eight minutes), the bead mat was flexed to remove the beads. A total of 18 fixed-bearing (right, mid-sized (#3)), U2 posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty system implants (United Orthopedic Corp., Hsinchu, Taiwan) were tested, consisting of a CoCr-molybdenum (CoCrMo) femoral component articulating against an irradiation-sterilized, conventional UHMWPE tibial component fixed into a Ti6Al4V tray. Prior to testing, the UHMWPE tibial components were soaked in sterile water for a minimum of two weeks to maximize moisture uptake. Three experimental groups of six implants were investigated (Fig. 1). New implants (negative controls, initial mean surface roughness (Ra) ~ 0.02 µm) were assessed to give a baseline wear rate for this implant. For the positive controls, the CoCr femoral components were scratched directly with a diamond stylus, representative of ‘severe’ third-body damage, to demonstrate that scratches with a sufficiently large lip height would influence UHMWPE wear.24 Scratches were created using a 200 µm radius diamond stylus (Euro Products Ltd., Stourbridge, United Kingdom) in a grid pattern within the articulation zone of both medial and lateral condyles; 15 scratches ran mediolaterally and seven ran parallel to the flexion-extension (FE) axis, with 2 mm spacing. Scratches had a lip height > 3 µm,13 an initial maximum profile height averaged over the sampling length (Rp) of ~1.3 µm, and an initial Ra of ~0.4 µm.

Fig. 1 
            Flowchart showing the different test conditions. *Gravimetric analysis. †Surface topography assessment. CS-BVF, calcium sulphate bone void filler; MC, million cycles.

Fig. 1

Flowchart showing the different test conditions. *Gravimetric analysis. †Surface topography assessment. CS-BVF, calcium sulphate bone void filler; MC, million cycles.

Methods

Experimental wear simulation was carried out using a six-station Leeds/ProSim electropneumatic knee simulator (Simulation Solutions, Stockport, United Kingdom).25 The simulator has six degrees of freedom with four controlled axes of motion: axial force (AF), flexion/extension (FE), tibial rotation (TR), and anteroposterior displacement (AP). Abduction-adduction was unconstrained and the mediolateral offset fixed as detailed in the ISO standard.26 Leeds intermediate kinematic conditions were used (Fig. 2); AF (maximum 2800 N) and FE (0° to 60°) were adapted from ISO 14243-3.26 Tibial rotation (± 5°) and AP (maximum 5 mm) were driven through the tibial side of the implant and based on the natural kinematics of the knee.25 Displacement control was used for the AP and TR motion to maintain consistency between the input kinematics irrespective of changes in the surface topography of the articulating surfaces.

Fig. 2 
            Chart showing the input kinematic conditions to knee simulator.

Fig. 2

Chart showing the input kinematic conditions to knee simulator.

The methodology described by Zietz et al17 was adapted to simulate third-body wear using a single 5 cc dose of CS-BVF beads, typical of the volume used in infected TKA revision procedures.19 The beads were placed on both compartments of the tibial component and, to ensure they became entrained within the articulating surfaces, the simulator was run without lubricant for 60 cycles. The test lubricant, 25% bovine serum with 0.03% (v/v) sodium azide solution, was then added to the test cell and the simulator was run for 115 000 cycles. The timepoint replicated the six to eight weeks that the CS-BVF beads are present before their resorption,19 based on a typical TKA patient completing one million steps per year. This was the only dose of CS-BVF used as, after this duration, the CS-BVF would have resorbed19 so no further third-body damage would occur.

The surface topography of the articulating surfaces of the femoral components was assessed prior to the start of the study, after 115 000 cycles, and after three million cycles (MC) (Fig. 1), using a Taylor Hobson Form Talysurf with a 2 µm conical tip stylus (Taylor Hobson Ltd., Leicester, United Kingdom). Five measurements were taken across each femoral condyle in a mediolateral direction within the flexion range. Least squares arc form removal and Gaussian filtering with a lower cut-off of 0.25 mm was applied to the measurements in line with ISO 4288:1998.27 The surface roughness parameters of interest were Ra, Rp, and the maximum valley depth (Rv). To investigate the influence of CS-BVF on third-body wear of UHMWPE, 3 MC of experimental wear simulation were carried out under the previously described test conditions. After every 0.3 MC, the simulator was stopped and cleaned, and the lubricant was replaced. After every 1 MC, the implants were moved to the adjacent station to reduce interstation variability. The wear of the UHMWPE tibial components was assessed gravimetrically at 115 000 cycles, 1 MC, and 3 MC (Fig. 1) using a Mettler Toledo XP205 digital microbalance (Mettler Toledo Inc., Columbus, Ohio) with a resolution of 0.01 mg. Two unloaded soak controls were used to compensate for moisture uptake by the polyethylene.

The data set associated with this article is openly available from the University of Leeds Data Repository.28

Statistical analysis

The mean and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the wear rate, and for surface parameters Ra, Rp, and Rv. Statistical analysis was carried out between the three experimental groups using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a post hoc Tukey’s test in SPSS 22 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). Data were considered significant at p < 0.05.

Results

When the beads of CS-BVF were trapped between the components, and the simulator was run without lubricant, the calcium sulphate was ground to a fine powder. Figure 3 shows the wear volume of the UHMWPE tibial components over the duration of the study. The wear rate of the UHMWPE tibial components was higher in the CS-BVF group (24.1 mm3/MC (95% CI 0.9 to 47.3)) and the positive control group (49.9 mm3/MC (95% CI 43.6 to 56.2)) between 0 and 115 000 cycles than between 115 000 cycles and 3 MC. For the negative controls, the wear rate between 0 and 115 000 cycles was 2.4 mm3/MC (95% CI 0.6 to 4.2), and there was no apparent change in the wear rate of the negative control components over the duration of the study.

Fig. 3 
          Chart showing mean wear volume (mm3) and 95% confidence intervals of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tibial components (n = 6). CS-BVF, calcium sulphate bone void filler.

Fig. 3

Chart showing mean wear volume (mm3) and 95% confidence intervals of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tibial components (n = 6). CS-BVF, calcium sulphate bone void filler.

Figure 4 shows the mean wear rate of the UHMWPE tibial components during wear simulation between 115 000 cycles and 3 MC when no CS-BVF particles were present in the test cell. Between these timepoints, the influence of surface damage caused by the CS-BVF on the wear of the UHMWPE could be assessed. The mean wear rate of the negative controls was 2.7 mm3/MC (95% CI 1.2 to 4.2). Implants challenged with CS-BVF and the positive controls had wear rates of 3.3 mm3/MC (95% CI 1.8 to 4.8) and 20.6 mm3/MC (95% CI 15.5 to 27.7), respectively. A one-way ANOVA of all the groups showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in wear rate of the UHMWPE tibial components under the different test conditions; however, post hoc analysis showed there to be no significant difference (p = 0.95) between the negative controls and implants challenged with CS-BVF. Visual inspection of the tibial components showed no evidence of CS-BVF particles embedded in the polyethylene.

Fig. 4 
          Chart showing mean wear rate calculated between 115 000 cycles and 3 MC (mm3/MC) and 95% confidence intervals of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tibial components (n = 6). CS-BVF, calcium sulphate bone void filler.

Fig. 4

Chart showing mean wear rate calculated between 115 000 cycles and 3 MC (mm3/MC) and 95% confidence intervals of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) tibial components (n = 6). CS-BVF, calcium sulphate bone void filler.

Light scratching was visible on the surface of the CoCr femoral components of both the negative controls and the implants challenged with CS-BVF. The surface roughness of the femoral components was assessed after 115 000 and 3 MC wear simulation (Table I). One-way ANOVA showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in all the surface roughness parameters measured; however, post hoc analysis showed no significant difference between the surface roughness of the negative control implants and those challenged with CS-BVF at the conclusion of the study for Ra (p = 0.28), Rp (p = 0.95), or Rv (p = 0.20).

Table I.

Mean surface roughness and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of femoral components taken in a mediolateral direction following 115 000 cycles of wear simulation and three million cycles (MC) of wear simulation (n = 6)

After 115 000 cycles wear simulation
After 3 MC wear simulation
Parameters Negative controls CS-BVF Positive controls Negative controls CS-BVF Positive controls
Mean Ra, µm (95% CI) 0.020 (0.014 to 0.026) 0.023 (0.018 to 0.028) 0.430 (0.391 to 0.469) 0.057 (0.022 to 0.092) 0.092 (0.045 to 0.139) 0.450 (0.411 to 0.489)
Mean Rp, µm (95% CI) 0.041 (0.027 to 0.055) 0.035 (0.025 to 0.045) 1.327 (1.224 to 1.430) 0.125 (0.047 to 0.203) 0.143 (0.084 to 0.202) 1.361 (1.208 to 1.514)
Mean Rv, µm (95% CI) 0.045 (0.023 to 0.067) 0.042 (0.032 to 0.052) 0.838 (0.743 to 0.933) 0.150 (0.070 to 0.230) 0.240 (0.132 to 0.348) 0.878 (0.797 to 0.959)
  1. CS-BVF, calcium sulphate bone void filler; Ra, mean surface roughness; Rp, maximum profile height averaged over the sampling length; Rv, maximum valley depth

Discussion

This study used experimental full-joint simulation to replicate third-body wear of TKAs with CS-BVF. It was hypothesized that third-body wear with CS-BVF would not influence the wear of polyethylene.20-22

The negative controls gave the baseline wear rate for this implant tested under Leeds intermediate kinematic conditions. Under these conditions, a typical wear rate for a moderately conforming fixed-bearing knee arthroplasty with a conventional polyethylene tibial insert would be 8.6 mm3/MC (95% CI 5.2 to 12).25 The wear rate of this implant was lower at 2.7 mm3/MC (95% CI 1.2 to 4.2), but of the same order of magnitude to similar designs tested under the same conditions.25 Measuring low wear rates (< 5 mm3/MC) by gravimetric analysis is difficult and brings about the potential for wear to be influenced by random errors in the system. The implants challenged with CS-BVF showed no significant difference in steady state wear rate (3.3 mm3/MC (95% CI 1.8 to 4.8)) compared with the negative controls. When the beads of CS-BVF were trapped between the components in the simulator, the CS-BVF became a fine powder, visual inspection showed no CS-BVF particles embedded in the polyethylene, and there was no influence on the surface roughness of the implants compared with the negative controls. Previous studies applying a similar experimental approach using cement particles containing hard agglomerates of zirconium dioxide have shown scratching to the CoCr femoral components and an elevated wear rate of UHMWPE;17,18 however, introduction of bone fragments into the lubricant did not influence wear.18 Therefore, the abrasiveness of the third-body particle is a strong determinant as to whether the CoCr counterfaces will become scratched by the debris.18,29 The wear of UHMWPE is influenced by the lip height of the scratches on CoCr counterfaces, which must be above a critical value to elevate wear.30 In this study, only the scratches on the positive control implants, representative of surface damage at the upper limit of that measured on retrieved femoral knee31 and hip24 components, had lip heights of sufficient magnitude to influence the wear rate of UHMWPE (20.6 mm3/MC (95% CI 15.5 to 25.7)). The approach used to create scratches on the surface of the CoCr femoral components has not previously been used in the simulation of third-body damage in TKAs; however, this method has been used extensively in simple geometry studies13 and total hip arthroplasties.15,32 In a hip simulation study, scratches created with a lip height of 3 µm led to an eight-fold increase in wear compared with undamaged controls.32 The increase in wear rate seen in this study is of similar magnitude.

Previous studies investigating third-body wear with calcium sulphate in the hip have shown a higher rate of UHMWPE wear while the calcium sulphate was in situ.20 When the third-body challenged implants were subsequently tested in a clean environment, the wear rates returned to values similar to those of the negative controls. An elevated wear rate and a high variability in the wear rate of UHMWPE were also noted in the present study between 0 and 115 000 cycles when CS-BVF was present in the test lubricant (mean wear rate of 24.1 mm3/MC (95% CI 0.9 to 47.3) between 0 and 115 000 cycles; 3.3 mm3/MC (95% CI 1.8 to 4.8) between 115 000 and 3 MC). This effect was not seen in the negative controls (mean wear rate of 2.4 mm3/MC (95% CI 0.6 to 4.2) between 0 and 115 000 cycles; 2.8 mm3/MC (95% CI 1.3 to 4.3) between 115 000 and 3 MC). However, a similar elevated wear rate was seen in the positive controls (mean wear rate of 49.9 mm3/MC (95% CI 43.6 to 56.2) between 0 and 115 000 cycles; 20.6 mm3/MC (95% CI 15.5 to 25.7) between 115 000 and 3 MC), so it was not known whether this was a test artefact perhaps caused by inconsistent moisture uptake by the polyethylene due to the very short test interval (115 000 cycles), or whether the elevated wear rate was a real effect. If the elevated wear rate was a real effect, with the short duration that the calcium sulphate beads remain in the body prior to their resorption, it is not anticipated that this short-term increase in wear rate would accelerate wear-debris-induced osteolysis. Our findings corroborate those of previous studies that have investigated the use of CS-BVF materials and have shown them not to influence the wear of UHMWPE.20-22

Following third-body wear, light linear scratching was apparent on the surface of the CoCr femoral components running in an AP direction, the principle direction of sliding. The measured surface roughness of the CoCr femoral components, however, was similar to that of the negative control implants. With the third-body damage methodology used, CS-BVFs were therefore considered to have no influence on the surface topography of the CoCr femoral components. Scratching parallel to the direction of the FE motion commonly occurs during experimental wear simulation of knee arthroplasties, even without the addition of contaminants to the lubricant.33

There were limitations associated with this in vitro study that must be considered in the clinical interpretation of the findings. One of the limitations was its duration: 3 MC is equivalent to three years in vivo in a moderately active patient;34 a younger, more active patient, however, may complete a greater number of steps, approaching two million per year.35 Also, the damage simulation was carried out in ~ 30 hours, an equivalent number of cycles to the six to eight weeks in which the CS-BVFs typically resorb. It should also be noted that the calcium sulphate used in this study was a commercially available, synthetically manufactured CS-BVF product and hence had a high purity (> 99%). Other similar CS-BVF materials may be manufactured by different processing routes. Medical-grade calcium sulphate, for example, is derived from earth-sourced gypsum rock and is a relatively soft material with a value of 2 on the Mohs scale.36 However, it may contain insoluble and potentially harder impurities such as quartz (7 on the Mohs scale)36 or slower-absorbing calcium phosphate constituents that may have an influence on the wear of UHMWPE,21 meaning that the findings from this study do not translate directly to all bone void filler materials.


L. M. Jennings; email:
Author contributions

R. M. Cowie: Designed the study, Acquired and analyzed the data, Wrote the manuscript.

S. S. Aiken: Designed the study, Prepared the bone void fillers, Wrote the manuscript.

J. J. Cooper: Designed the study, Wrote the manuscript.

L. M. Jennings: Designed the study, Analyzed the data, Wrote the manuscript.


Open access

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Rachel Pallan for assistance with running these studies, Phil Wood and the iMBE technical team for their expertise. Biocomposites Ltd provided the bone void fillers, the knee implants and funding for the study.

Funding statement

The author or one or more of the authors have received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. In addition, benefits have been or will be directed to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other non- profit organization with which one or more of the authors are associated.

ICMJE COI statement

R. M. Cowie and L. M. Jennings report grants from Biocomposites Ltd, Wellcome Trust, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC). S. S. Aiken and J. J. Cooper are paid employees of Biocomposites Ltd.

Follow us @BoneJointRes

References

1. No authors listed. 12th Annual Report, 2015. National Joint Registry. 2015. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/12th%20annual%20report/NJR%20Online%20Annual%20Report%202015.pdf (date last accessed 26 October 2018). Google Scholar

2. Kurtz SM , Lau E , Schmier J et al. . Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty2008;23:984-991.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

3. No authors listed. 2nd Annual Report, 2005. National Joint Registry. 2005. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Portals/0/Documents/England/Reports/NJR_AR_2.pdf (date last accessed 26 October 2018). Google Scholar

4. Moran E , Byren I , Atkins BL . The diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infections. J Antimicrob Chemother2010;65(Suppl 3):iii45-iii54.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

5. Kanellakopoulou K , Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ . Carrier systems for the local delivery of antibiotics in bone infections. Drugs2000;59:1223-1232.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

6. Geurts JAP , Janssen DM , Kessels AG , Walenkamp GH . Good results in postoperative and hematogenous deep infections of 89 stable total hip and knee replacements with retention of prosthesis and local antibiotics. Acta Orthop2013;84:509-516.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

7. Everhart JS , Granger JF , Calhoun JH . Depot antibiotics. Tech Orthop2015;30:223-229. Google Scholar

8. George DA , Konan S , Haddad FS . Single-stage hip and knee exchange for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty2015;30:2264-2270.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

9. Winkler H , Haiden P . Allograft bone as antibiotic carrier. J Bone Jt Infect2017;2:52-62.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

10. Risitano S , Sabatini L , Atzori F , Massè A , Indelli PF . Static antibiotic spacers augmented by calcium sulphate impregnated beads in revision TKA: surgical technique and review of literature. J Orthop2018;15:313-318.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

11. Engh GA , Dwyer KA , Hanes CK . Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]1992;74-B:9-17.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

12. Jones VC , Williams IR , Auger DD et al. . Quantification of third body damage to the tibial counterface in mobile bearing knees. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2001;215:171-179.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

13. Fisher J , Firkins P , Reeves EA , Hailey JL , Isaac GH . The influence of scratches to metallic counterfaces on the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Proc Inst Mech Eng H1995;209:263-264.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

14. Wang A , Essner A . Three-body wear of UHMWPE acetabular cups by PMMA particles against CoCr, alumina and zirconia heads in a hip joint simulator. Wear2001;250:212-216. Google Scholar

15. Barbour PS , Stone MH , Fisher J . A hip joint simulator study using new and physiologically scratched femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene acetabular cups. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2000;214:569-576.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

16. Ries MD , Salehi A , Widding K , Hunter G . Polyethylene wear performance of oxidized zirconium and cobalt-chromium knee components under abrasive conditions. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]2002;84-A(Suppl 2):129-135.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

17. Zietz C , Bergschmidt P , Lange R , Mittelmeier W , Bader R . Third-body abrasive wear of tibial polyethylene inserts combined with metallic and ceramic femoral components in a knee simulator study. Int J Artif Organs2013;36:47-55.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

18. Schroeder C , Grupp TM , Fritz B et al. . The influence of third-body particles on wear rate in unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a wear simulator study with bone and cement debris. J Mater Sci Mater Med2013;24:1319-1325.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

19. McPherson E , Dipane M , Sherif S . Dissolvable antibiotic beads in treatment of periprosthetic joint infection and revision arthroplasty-the use of synthetic pure calcium sulfate (Stimulan®) impregnated with vancomycin & tobramycin. Reconstr Rev2013;3:12. Google Scholar

20. Heuberger R , Wahl P , Krieg J , Gautier E . Low in vitro third-body wear on total hip prostheses induced by calcium sulphate used for local antibiotic therapy. Eur Cell Mater2014;28:246-257.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

21. Cowie RM , Carbone S , Aiken S , Cooper JJ , Jennings LM . Influence of third-body particles originating from bone void fillers on the wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene. Proc Inst Mech Eng H2016;230:775-783.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

22. Lewicki K , Prioreschi B , Koenig K et al. . The effect of absorbable calcium sulfate on wear rates in ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene: potential implications for its use in treating arthroplasty infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg2017;25:e114-e120.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

23. Parker AC , Smith JK , Courtney HS , Haggard WO . Evaluation of two sources of calcium sulfate for a local drug delivery system: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res2011;469:3008-3015.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

24. Tipper JL , Ingham E , Hailey JL et al. . Quantitative analysis of polyethylene wear debris, wear rate and head damage in retrieved Charnley hip prostheses. J Mater Sci Mater Med2000;11:117-124.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

25. Galvin AL , Kang L , Udofia I et al. . Effect of conformity and contact stress on wear in fixed-bearing total knee prostheses. J Biomech2009;42:1898-1902.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

26. No authors listed. ISO 14243-3:2014. Implants for surgery — Wear of total knee-joint prostheses — Part 3: Loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with displacement control and corresponding environmental conditions for test. International Organization for Standardization. 2014. https://www.iso.org/standard/56649.html (date last accessed 26 October 2018). Google Scholar

27. No authors listed. ISO 4288:1996. Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Profile method — Rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture. International Organization for Standardization. 1996. https://www.iso.org/standard/2096.html (date last accessed 26 October 2018). Google Scholar

28. Cowie RM , Jennings LM . Data associated with “The influence of a calcium sulfate bone void filler on the third body damage and polyethylene wear of total knee replacements”. University of Leeds; 2018. http://archive.researchdata.leeds.ac.uk/436/ (date last accessed 11 February 2019). Google Scholar

29. Caravia L , Dowson D , Fisher J , Jobbins B . The influence of bone and bone cement debris on counterface roughness in sliding wear tests of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on stainless steel. Proc Inst Mech Eng H1990;204:65-70.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

30. Minakawa H , Stone MH , Wroblewski BM et al. . Quantification of third-body damage and its effect on UHMWPE wear with different types of femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]1998;80-B:894-899.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

31. Muratoglu OK , Burroughs BR , Bragdon CR et al. . Knee simulator wear of polyethylene tibias articulating against explanted rough femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res2004;428:108-113.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

32. Bowsher JG , Shelton JC . A hip simulator study of the influence of patient activity level on the wear of crosslinked polyethylene under smooth and roughened femoral conditions. Wear2001;250:167-179. Google Scholar

33. McEwen HM , Barnett PI , Bell CJ et al. . The influence of design, materials and kinematics on the in vitro wear of total knee replacements. J Biomech2005;38:357-365.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

34. Schmalzried TP , Szuszczewicz ES , Northfield MR et al. . Quantitative assessment of walking activity after total hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]1998;80-A:54-59. Google Scholar

35. Jennings LM , Al-Hajjar M , Brockett CL et al. . (iv) Enhancing the safety and reliability of joint replacement implants. Orthop Trauma2012;26:246-252.CrossrefPubMed Google Scholar

36. No authors listed. Mohs scale of mineral hardness. New World Encyclopedia. 2018. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Mohs_scale_of_mineral_hardness (date last accessed 26 October 2018). Google Scholar