Peer review

H. Twaij; S. Oussedik; P. Hoffmeyer

doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041

Article alerts Social media

Current issue

Annotation

Peer review

H. Twaij
S. Oussedik
P. Hoffmeyer

Download PDF

Peer review

Twaij H, Oussedik S, Hoffmeyer P. Peer review. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(4):436-441. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041

Twaij, H., et al. “Peer review.” The Bone & Joint Journal, vol. 96-B, no. 4, 2014, pp. 436-441., https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041

Twaij, H., Oussedik, S., & Hoffmeyer, P. (2014). Peer review. The Bone & Joint Journal, 96-B(4), 436-441. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041

Twaij, H., Oussedik, S. and Hoffmeyer, P. (2014) “Peer review.” The Bone & Joint Journal, 96-B(4), pp. 436-441. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041

Twaij, H., S. Oussedik, and P. Hoffmeyer. “Peer review.” The Bone & Joint Journal 96-B, no. 4 (2014): 436-441. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041

Twaij H, Oussedik S, Hoffmeyer P. Peer review. Bone Joint J. 2014 Apr 1;96-B(4):436-441. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B4.33041

Copy to clipboard

BibTeX

EndNote

RIS

Abstract

The maintenance of quality and integrity in clinical and basic science research depends upon peer review. This process has stood the test of time and has evolved to meet increasing work loads, and ways of detecting fraud in the scientific community. However, in the 21st century, the emphasis on evidence-based medicine and good science has placed pressure on the ways in which the peer review system is used by most journals.

This paper reviews the peer review system and the problems it faces in the digital age, and proposes possible solutions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:436–41.

Correspondence should be sent to Mr H Twaij; e-mail: htwaij@nhs.net

For access options please click here

Figure 1

Some description here