header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS AND ITS USES IN COMPLEX TIBIAL FRACTURES

European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 2015, Annual Conference, 2–4 September 2015. Part 2.



Abstract

Background

Comminuted fractures involving the tibia are associated with a high level of complications including delayed healing and non-union, in conjunction with dramatically increased healthcare costs. Certain clinicians utilise a Pixel Value Ratio (PRV) of 1 to indicate such fracture healing. The subjectivity of this method has led to mixed outcomes including regenerate fracture. The poor prognosis of complex load bearing fractures is accentuated by the fact that no quantitative gold standard currently exists to which clinicians can reference regarding the definition of a healed fracture. The aim of the current study is to use patient specific finite element analysis of complex tibial fractures treated with Ilizarov frames to demonstrate callus maturation and to determine the optimum frame removal time.

Methods

3 patients (2 males, 1 female) were analysed following presentation with complex tibial fractures treated with Ilizarov frames. Patient specific computational analysis was performed according to radiographic data, incorporating maturing material properties to analyse the callus response to weight bearing over the healing timeframe. Computational results were compared to the PVR method to evaluate its efficacy in determining the optimum Ilizarov frame removal time.

Results

All fractures were observed to clinically heal at a mean of 25.4 (±2.404) weeks. Following computational analysis however, the mean optimum Ilizarov frame removal time was seen to be 23.5 (±2.323) weeks. When compared with the PVR method, the suggested removal time presented a mean PVR of 1.025 (±0.017).

Conclusion

Computational models of patient specific tibial fractures has shown promising correlations with the PVR method and has shown efficacy in predicting callus strength and subsequent optimum frame removal time.

Level of Evidence

Level 4