Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is now the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Raised blood pressures (BP) are associated with increased cardiovascular risks such as myocardial infarction, stroke and arteriosclerosis. During surgery the haemodynamic effects of stress are closely monitored and stabilised by the anaesthetist. Although there have been many studies assessing the effects of intraoperative stress on the patient, little is known about the impact on the surgeon.
A prospective cohort study was carried out using an ambulatory blood pressure monitor to measure the BP and heart rates (HR) of three consultants and their respective trainees during hallux valgus, hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. Our principle aim was to assess the physiological effects of performing routine operations on the surgeon. We noted if there were any differences in the stress response of the lead surgeon, in comparison to when the same individual was assisting. In addition, we recorded the trainee's BP and HR when they were operating independently. The intraoperative measurements were compared with their baseline readings and their stress response, assessed using the Bruce protocol.
Many trends were noted in this pilot study. All of the surgeons had higher BP and HR readings on operating days compared to baseline. The physiological parameters normalised by one hour post-theatre list in all subjects. When the trainer was leading the operation, their BP gradually increased until implant placement, while their trainees remained stable. On the other hand, when the trainee was operating and the trainer assisting, the trainer's BP peaked at the beginning of the procedure, and slowly declined as it progressed. The trainee's BP remained elevated throughout. The highest peaks for trainees were noted during independent operating.
We conclude that all surgery is stressful, and that trainees are more likely to be killing themselves than their trainers.
