header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

HIGH REVISION RATE OF THE REJUVENATE MODULAR NECK FEMORAL STEM AT THREE TO FIVE YEARS' FOLLOW-UP

The International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty (ISTA), 29th Annual Congress, October 2016. PART 3.



Abstract

Introduction

We previously reported a 28% short-term corrosion-related revision rate of recalled Rejuvenate modular stem. The purpose of this study was to assess the mid-term clinical results and survivorship of this implant.

Methods

Between June 2009 and July 2012, 73 total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 63 patients with the Rejuvenate modular neck implant were performed by a single surgeon and prospectively followed. Average age was 63.2 ± 12.6 years (28 to 86). Elevated metal ion (= 2 µg/L), pain, or positive MRI findings were indication for revision surgery. Correlation between patient factors with serum metal ion levels and revisions were analyzed.

Results

At an average follow-up of 4.2 ± 0.6 years (3.0 to 5.5), 57 hips (48 patients, 78%) were revised at mean of 3.2 ± 1 years (1 to 5.5); and 6 other have been scheduled for surgery. The Kaplan-Meier survivorship was 22 % at 5.5 years. Visible corrosion was seen at the trunion-stem junction in each revision case. 51 of 57 hips undergoing revision (89%), had elevated preoperative serum Co levels, 24 (42%) had elevated preoperative Cr. The average serum Co and Cr ion levels prior to revision surgery were 10 ± 8 µg/L (0.3 to 40) and 2.3 ± 1.5 µg/L (1 to 7.4), respectively. There was a significant correlation between revision surgery and younger age (p=0.0137). 52 hips underwent MRI evaluation, 22 hips (42%) had positive findings correlated to pain (p=0.025): 11 hips demonstrated adverse local soft tissue reactions such as fluid collection, capsular thickening, osteolysis, or synovitis, and 11 hips showed evidence of pseudotumor.

Conclusions

At mid-term follow-up, 86% of the Rejuvenated modular neck stems have been revised or awaiting revision. Given these findings, all patients with a Rejuvenate modular neck stem implant should be followed closely and advised of impending failure.


*Email: