header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MOBILE PHONE AND WEB APP FOR COLLECTING PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AFTER MUSCULOSKELETAL TREATMENT FOR LOW BACK PAIN

The Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) - Annual General Meeting 2015



Abstract

Background to the study:

The use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is being increasingly advocated but data are still being collected using paper systems. This is costly and environmentally challenging. New innovations are required to balance the challenges of capturing PROM data while considering budgets, and access to IT, and patient choice.

Purpose of the study:

To develop and test a mobile phone and web app for collecting patient reported outcomes about musculoskeletal symptoms.

Methods:

The content of the app was developed following qualitative work with patients and clinicians, and a review of measurement properties of different PROMs. Early versions of the app underwent α- and β-testing to identify issues with functionality. The PROM app was pilot-tested to assess feasibility, responsiveness, and test-retest reliability of the PROMs. The pilot version of the app contained demographic data, the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Bournemouth Questionnaire, and Visual Analogue Scale for pain. At follow-up additional questions exploring patient satisfaction and experience of care, plus a transition question were asked.

Results:

A total of 517 patient codes were allocated. Completed datasets were gathered from patients (N=92) potentially indicating issues with acceptability and feasibility. Data analysis indicated good completion of questions. The RMDQ appeared to be largely redundant in this patient population and was removed in the final version of the app.

Conclusion:

The app performed well when used by participants. Support is required for practitioners and patients to implement this electronic data capture system.


Email:

Conflicts of interest: RF is a director and shareholder of the company that provided services in this study. Other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest

Sources of funding: The development of the app content was funded by the Institute of Osteopathy (www.osteopathy.org). University of Warwick provided funding for vouchers to incentivise participants.