header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

PRE-OPERATIVE HIGH BODY MASS INDEX HAS NO EFFECT IN CLINICAL OUTCOME OF LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY

The Society for Back Pain Research (SBPR) - Annual General Meeting 2015



Abstract

Background:

Following lumbar spine surgery patients with a high BMI appear to have increased post-operative complications including surgical site infections (SSI), urinary complications, increased anaesthetic/operative time and a greater need for post-operative blood transfusion. There is no current evidence, however, analysing the effect of BMI on functional outcome.

Purpose:

We aimed to analyse the effect of BMI on functional outcome following lumbar spine surgery.

Study Design:

Retrospective Cohort Study

Patient Sample:

131

Outcome Measures:

Outcome measures included mean post-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at six and twelve months, the incidence of SSI, mean operative time and the requirement for post-operative blood transfusion.

Methods:

Patients that underwent lumbar spinal surgery between September 2010 and November 2013 were identified retrospectively and categorised into discectomy, decompression, fusion and revision is created. A BMI threshold of 30 was used to group patients as non-obese or obese. Univariate analysis was used to compare the effect of BMI on the above outcome measures.

Results:

Post-operative complication rates were higher in the obese group in each category. However, there was no significant difference in the post-operative ODI at six ad twelve months post-operatively.

Conclusions:

Increased BMI is related to increased post-operative complications but is not associated with a poorer functional outcome in the short to mid-term.


Email Address:

Conflict Of Interest/ Sources of Funding: No external funding or support was obtained for the purposes of this study from industry or elsewhere. Internal resources of first author were only been used. No help is taken for techniques, questionnaire used were pre designed. No help with data collection or analysis of sample everything done solely by authors.