header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

DISTRIBUTION AND ORGANISATION COMPARISON OF EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS BETWEEN TENDON AND LIGAMENT

British Society for Matrix Biology (BSMB) Satellite Meeting: ‘Advances in Tendon Research: From Bench to Bedside’



Abstract

Introduction

Tendons and ligaments (TLs) play key roles in the musculoskeletal system. However, they are commonly damaged due to age-related wear and tear or torn in traumatic/sport related incidents resulting in pain and immobility. TLs contain cells and extracellular matrix (ECM) comprised of collagen, elastin, glycoproteins and proteoglycans. Although TLs are composed of similar components, their precise composition and arrangement of matrix macromolecules differ to provide specific mechanical properties and functions. To date little is known about how the main ECM proteins are arranged between the two tissue types. This data will provide essential information on fundamental structure of TLs leading to increased understanding of the function relationship between these tissue types. The aim of this study was to compare tendon-ligament differences in their ECM distribution of collagens, proteoglycans and elastic fibres.

Materials and Methods

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and long digital extensor tendon (LDET) were harvested from disease free cadaveric canine knee joints (n=3). Distributions of the main ECM components were assessed on longitudinal sections of ACL and LDET mid-substance. Antibody staining were assessed for collagen type I, III, VI, agreccan, versican, decorin, biglycan, elastin, fibrillin 1 and fibrillin 2.

Results

Marked staining of collagen type I was present at fascicular regions, but also present at the interfascicular matrix (IFM). Collagen type III was present at the IFM of tendon, whilst in the ligament it was more widespread being located at both fascicles and IFM. In both TLs, collagen type VI was localised at IFM, but also present surrounding TL fibroblasts. A marked staining of aggrecan and versican was observed in ligament IFM, with pericellular staining of aggrecan present only in ligament. Decorin was found in both fascicular and IFM, whilst biglycan was occasionally present pericelullarly and at IFM in tendon. A similar pattern of elastic fibre distribution was found in both TLs.

Discussion

This study has revealed a different ECM distribution of collagen type III, aggrecan, versican in ligament than when compared to tendon. These finding may relate to different functions between TLs and indicate that ligament is subjected to more compressive forces, resulting in different macromolecular arrangements that protect the tissue from damage.


Email: