header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Trauma

REDUCTION USING THE EXTERNAL FIXATOR VERSUS ARTHROSCOPIC REDUCTION IN THE TREATMENT OF INTRA-ARTICULAR FRACTURES OF THE DISTAL RADIUS

International Society for Fracture Repair (ISFR)



Abstract

Background

The usefulness of arthroscopic reduction for the intra-articular fracture of the distal radius has been reported, although it is technically difficult.

Hypothesis

Our hypothesis is that the reduction using the external fixator is useful as equivalent to the arthroscopic reduction for the intra-articular fracture of the distal radius fracture in the fixation with the volar locking plate.

Materials & Methods

The surgery was performed in both methods randomly for 40 patients; average age 64(24 to 92) years, 11 male, 29 female. Image evaluations were performed at 24 weeks after surgery. Ulnar variance, Radial inclination, Volar tilt in the X-ray image, and gap and step in the computed tomogram were evaluated. Clinical evaluation was performed at 6, 12, 24 weeks after surgery. Objective evaluations were ranges of motion and grip strength. Subjective evaluations were disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH).

Results

The results of image and objective evaluation had no significant difference between the two groups. DASH in arthroscopic group was significantly inferior at 24 weeks because of minor complications.

Discussion & Conclusion

The external fixator and the arthroscopy are equally valuable in reduction of articular surface.