header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Oncology

PRIMARY BONE TUMOURS – HOW CLOSE IS ACCEPTABLE?

The European Musculo-Skeletal Oncology Society (EMSOS)



Abstract

Introduction

Recently a great deal of interest has emerged in new techniques for resection of bone tumours, such as the use of computer guided surgery, joint sparing prostheses and epiphysiolysis. However, all the techniques may require narrower margins at resection than the traditional Enneking wide margins. The aim of the study was to look at the effect of width and tissue at surgical margins, together with the use of adjuvant therapy on locally recurrent disease and disease free survival.

Methods

The quality in terms of precise distance (mm) and tissue has been regularly reported by our pathologists for 5 years, prior to this it was reported as wide, marginal or intralesional. It is known from previous studies that 90% of locally recurrent disease for osteosarcoma and Ewings occurs within 2 years from surgery. Therefore all primary bone sarcomas of the pelvis and appendicular skeleton that underwent surgery between 1/1/2005 and 1/1/2008 were entered into the study group, giving at least 2 years follow up. The pathology records were reviewed and the quality of the margins and percentage tumour necrosis were recorded. Those patients who had suffered local or distal disease relapse or died were highlighted. Analysis was undertaken by Kaplan Meier survival curves with univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

370 patients were identified who had undergone surgery for primary bone tumours, 30 patients had suffered locally recurrent disease (8%). These local recurrences were mainly in patients with chondrosarcoma (13 pts), whilst less frequent in osteosarcoma (7 pts) and Ewings (7 pts). All patients with locally recurrent tumour either had poor necrosis following chemotherapy or inadequate margins. When analysed, the risk of LR was comparable between those patients with good post chemotherapy (>90%) necrosis and wide margins (>1cm) and those with good necrosis and narrow margins (2-10mm). Whilst those with poor margins of <2mm, or those with <90% post chemotherapy necrosis had significantly higher rates of local recurrence. A similar effect was seen with overall survival. Conclusion : Margins >2mm appear to be safe providing there has been effective adjuvant therapy, predicting the response to chemotherapy prior to surgery may offer significant advantages to the patient, allowing different resection techniques in good responders.