Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
The popularity of all-inside meniscal repair devices has led to a shift away from inside-out meniscus repair without comparative studies to support the change. The aim of this study was to compare the failure rate and time to failure of all-inside and inside-out meniscus repair performed in elite athletes.
Methodology
A retrospective review was performed of all elite athletes who underwent meniscal repair, with a minimum of two-year follow-up between 2013 and 2019. Repairs were classified as all-inside or inside-out according to the repair technique. Failure was defined as undergoing a subsequent surgery to address a persistent meniscal tear.
Results
192 (135 lateral and 57 medial) meniscal repairs in elite athletes were included and 41 (21%) failed. Medial meniscus tears repaired with the all-inside technique failed at a significantly higher rate (58%) than medial meniscus tears repaired with the inside-out (23%) or lateral meniscus tears repaired with the all-inside (12%) or inside-out (14%) technique (p<.001). At 1 year following repair, 8% of lateral meniscus repairs had failed regardless of technique. Medial meniscus repairs failed at an approximate rate of 15% for inside-out technique and 42% for all-inside technique. By 2 years, approximately 54% of all-inside medial meniscus repairs had failed and by 5 years over 60% of repairs had failed.
Conclusion
All-inside medial meniscal repair led to a higher rate of failure compared to inside-out medial or lateral meniscus repair in elite athletes. Medial meniscus repairs failed at a high rate than lateral meniscal repairs.
