Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
MCL injuries often occur concurrently with ACL rupture – most noncontact ACL injuries occur in valgus and external rotation (ER) - and conservative MCL treatment leads to increased rate of ACL reconstruction failure. There has been little work developing effective MCL reconstructions.
Methods
Cadaveric work measured MCL attachments by digitisation and radiographically, relating them to anatomical landmarks. The isometry of the superficial and deep MCL (sMCL and dMCL) and posterior oblique ligament (POL) was measured using fine sutures led to displacement transducers. Contributions to stability (restraint) were measured in a robotic testing system. Two MCL reconstructions were designed and tested: 3-strand reconstruction (sMCL+dMCL+POL), and 2-strand method (sMCL+dMCL) addressing anteromedial rotatory instability (AMRI). The resulting stability was measured in a kinematics test rig, and compared to the ‘anatomic’ sMCL+POL reconstruction of LaPrade.
Results
The sMCL was isometric, centred on the medial epicondyle, and the primary restraint of valgus. The dMCL elongated rapidly in ER, and was the primary restraint of ER near knee extension. The POL slackened rapidly with flexion and only stabilised the knee near extension. With sMCL+dMCL+POL deficiency (‘grade 3’), the 2-strand AM reconstruction restored all stability measures to native, apart from internal rotation. The 3-strand reconstruction restored all stability measures to native. The LaPrade reconstruction did not control ER, lacking a dMCL graft, or valgus in flexion, being anisometric.
Conclusions
This work has revealed the importance of the dMCL in stabilising AMRI as part of anatomical MCL reconstruction, with the sMCL restraining valgus.
