Abstract
Introduction
Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common sequalae of limb reconstruction procedures. The subsequent biomechanical compensation can be directly linked to degenerative arthritis, lower back pain, scoliosis and functional impairment. It becomes particularly problematic when >2cm, established as a clinical standard. This two-arm experimental study assesses how reliable an iPhone application is in the measurement of LLD at different distances in control and LLD patients.
Materials and Methods
42 participants were included in the study, divided evenly into 21 control and 21 LLD patients. A standardised measurement technique was used to obtain TMM and iPhone application measurements, taken at a distance of 0.25m, 0.50m and 0.75m.
Results
The mean discrepancy of iPhone-based measurements in the control group was 1.57cm, 1.59cm and 2.19cm at 0.25m, 0.50m and 0.75m respectively. This compares to measurements in the LLD cohort with a mean discrepancy of 1.71cm, 1.85cm and 2.19cm. The overall mean discrepancy of iPhone data was 1.78cm in the control cohort compared to 1.92cm in the LLD cohort.
Conclusions
Results suggest that the iPhone application can be used to identify clinically significant leg length discrepancies. At 0.75 metres anomalous results become more prevalent and the accuracy of the application appears to decline. The results also suggest the application is slightly more accurate in the control group, nevertheless, in distances up to 0.50 metres the mean discrepancy sits within the 2cm standard of clinically significant LLD.
