Abstract
Introduction
Routine radiographs in the follow-up of circular frames is commonplace, however the effect on clinical decision making is unclear. Previous work locally has suggested that >95% of radiographs, particularly at early time points, do not affect clinical management. This study was conducted to assess the impact of a transition to early remote follow-up on circular frame patients with limited radiographic assessment.
Materials and Methods
Patients were identified from a prospective limb reconstruction database. Data were collected including the number of clinic appointments, type of clinic appointment, number of radiographs performed, and impact this had on clinical management. This was compared to our previous cohort of 85 patients undergoing standard follow-up.
Results
Fourteen patients were eligible for inclusion (mean age 45, range 26–75). Circular frames were indicated for trauma (12), or limb reconstruction (2). Following introduction of remote follow-up, the mean number of face-to-face appointments reduced from 6.1 to 1.7 to the point of frame removal. Conversion from telephone follow-up to face-to-face follow-up was required in just one case where hardware failure occurred. The number of radiographs during treatment was reduced from a mean of 22 to 11 (range 4–20).
Conclusions
Remote follow-up of circular frame patients was associated with significantly fewer radiographs and face-to-face appointments, without significantly increasing complications. We believe this is a safe and effective method of follow-up, optimising resource use in line with the NHS long term plan. Data collection is ongoing, and a larger cohort would be available for presentation.
