Abstract
Polyethylene wear-debris induced inflammatory osteolysis is known as the main cause of aseptic loosening and long term revision total hip arthroplasty. Although recent reports suggest that antioxidant impregnated ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear-debris have reduce the osteolytic potential in vivo when compared to virgin UHMWPE, little is known about if and/or how PE rate of oxidation affects osteolysis in vivo. We hypothesized that oxidized UHMWPE particles would cause more inflammatory osteolysis in a murine calvarial bone model when compared to virgin UHMWPE.
Male C57BL/6 eight weeks old received equal amount of particulate debris overlaying the calvarium of (n=12/group): sham treatment (no particles), 2mg (6,75×107 particles/mg) of endotoxin-free UHMWPE particles (PE) or of endotoxin-free highly oxidized-UHMWPE (OX) particles. In vivo osteolysis was assessed using high resolution micro-CT and inflammation with L-012 probe dependent luminescence. At day 10, calvarial bone was examined using high resolution micro-CT, histomorphometric, immunohistochemistry analyses and qRT-PCR to assess OPG, RANK, RANK-L, IL-10, IL-4, IL-1b and TRAP genes expression using the protocol defined by individual TaqManTM Gene Expression Assays Protocol (Applied Biosystems).
In vivo inflammation was significantly higher in the OX (1.60E+06 ± 8.28E+05 photons/s/cm2) versus PE (8.48E+05 ± 3.67E+05) group (p=0.01). Although there was a statistically significant difference between sham (−0.27% ± 2.55%) and implanted (PE: −9.7% ± 1.97%, and OX: − 8.38% ± 1.98%) groups with regards to bone resorption (p=0.02), this difference was not significant between OX and PE (p = 0.14). There was no significant difference between groups regarding PCR analyses for OPG, RANK, RANK-L, IL-10, IL-4, IL-1b and TRAP (p = 0.6, 0.7, 0.1, 0.6, 0.3, 0.4, 0.7 respectively). Bone volume density was significantly decreased in PE (13.3%±1.2%) and OX (12.2%±1.2%) groups when compared to sham (15%±0.9%) (p < 0 .05). Histomorphometric analyses showed a significantly decreased Bone Thickness/Tissue Thickness ratio in the implanted group (0.41±0.01 mm and 0.43±0.01 mm) compared to sham group (0.69± 0.01) (p < 0 .001). However, there were no significant difference between OX and PE (p = 0.2).
Our findings suggest that oxidized UHMWPE particles display increased inflammatory potential. Results were not significant regarding in vivo or ex vivo osteolysis. As antioxidant-diffused UHMWPE induce less inflammation activity in vivo, the mechanism by which they cause reduced osteolysis requires further investigation.
