Background

Proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) was defined to provide a treatment option for knee pain caused by gonarthrosis(1). Minor surgical procedure, low complication rate and dramatic pain relief were the main reasons for popularization of this procedure(2, 3). However, changes at the knee and ankle joint after PFO were not clarified objectively in the literature.

Questions/purposes

We asked: 1) Does PFO change the maximum and average pressures at the medial and lateral chondral surface of the tibia plateau? 2) Are chondral surface stresses redistributed at the knee and ankle joint after PFO? 3)Does PFO change the distribution of total load on the knee joint? 4) Can PFO lead to change in alignment of lower limb?

Methods

This study was conducted at Maltepe University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, Orthopedics and Traumatology Department and Yildiz Technical University Mechanical Engineering Department in Istanbul, Turkey, between September 2019 and February 2020. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to evaluate effects of PFO(4). One 62 years old, female volunteer's X-ray, computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging images were used for creating right lower limb model. Two different lower limb models were created. One of them was osteotomized model (OM) which was created according to definition of PFO and the other was non-osteotomized model (NOM). To obtain a stress distribution comparison between the two models, 350 N of axial force was applied to the femoral heads of the models.

Results

After PFO, the maximum contact pressures at the medial and lateral tibial cartilages decreased 83.2% and 66.9%, respectively at the knee joint. The average contact pressure decreased 26.1% at the medial tibial cartilage and increased 42.4% at the lateral tibial cartilage. The Von Mises stresses decreased 57.1% at the femoral cartilage and decreased 79.1% at tibial cartilage. The stress on the tibial cartilage increased 44.6%, and stress on the talar cartilage increased 7.1% at the ankle joint. Under a 350 N axial force, distribution of the total load at the knee joint was changed and become more homogenous in OM compared to NOM. Change in lower extremity alignment after PFO could not be evaluated with FEA.

Conclusion

FEA revealed that PFO causes some changes in knee and ankle joint kinematics. Main loading at the knee joint shifted from medial tibial cartilage to the lateral tibial cartilage after PFO. Additionally, the stresses on each cartilage were redistributed across a wider and more peripheral area. These changes could be the main reason for pain relief at the knee joint. FEA also demonstrated that the Von Mises stresses of the tibial and talar cartilages of the ankle joint increased after PFO. This stress increase may cause long-term arthritic changes in the ankle joint.

Level IV; in silico study.