Abstract
Aim
Simultaneous application of Ilizarov frames and free muscle flaps to treat osteomyelitis or infected non-unions is currently not standard practice in the UK, in part related to logistical issues, surgical duration and challenging access for microvascular anastomosis. We present the outcomes for 56 such patients.
Methods
Retrospective single centre consecutive series between 2005–2017. We recorded comorbidities, Cierny-Mader and Weber-Cech classification, the Ilizarov method used, flap and anastomosis used, follow-up duration, time to union and complications.
Results
56 patients (55 tibiae and 1 forearm) were included (mean age 48 years). Thirty-four cases had osteomyelitis (20/34 Cierny-Mader Stage IV) and 22 had an infected non-union (14/22 Weber-Cech Type E or F). Forty-six patients had a segmental defect after resection. Monofocal compression was used in 14, monofocal distraction in 15, bifocal compression/distraction in 8, bone transport in 9 and a protective frame in 10. 8/56 had an ankle fusion, 7/56 had an angular deformity corrected at the same time and 32 also had local antibiotic carrier inserted. Forty-six gracilis, 9 latissimus dorsi and 1 rectus abdominus flaps were used. Six cases required urgent flap re-exploration (5 anastomotic revisions and 1 haematoma washout) with 4/6 successfully salvaged. Two cases suffered total flap failure (3.6%). Both had successful revision free muscle flaps with the frame in situ at 10 and 16 days respectively. There were no partial flap failures and no failures in bone transport frames. Mean follow-up was 22 months (4–89). Excluding three cases that still have a frame on, 42/43 (97.7%) achieved bony union. Recurrence of infection occurred in 8.9%. All were infection free at final follow-up after further surgery.
Conclusions
With the right expertise, simultaneous Ilizarov frame and free muscle flap is safe and effective in treating complex limb infection, and is not associated with an increased flap failure rate.
Level of evidence
III
