Abstract
Background
The decision to attempt limb salvage vs to amputate in a significant traumatic limb injury is based on patient´s best predicted outcome. When amputation cannot be avoided the aim is to provide a pain free limb whilst preserving the soft tissue and limb length.
Methods
Retrospective study covering 5 years (2011–2016), all the trauma patients requiring lower limb amputation (LLA) included. Demographics, mechanism, type of injury, amputation type, cause and level, theatre trips for stump management were analysed.
Results
19 patients aged 27–93 included. RTC was the leading cause (47%) of LLA. Amputation type: traumatic, caused by the injury itself (31.5%) acute surgical, amputation performed in a limb threatening injury (37%); 72% of them had vascular compromise delayed amputations after failure of limb salvage surgery (31.5%); failed soft tissue coverage and poorly functioning limb were the lead cause (33% each) Type of injury: open fractures (89%), isolated to a limb segment (53%). One level/extended level=9/10 patients. More than 50% of initial amputations were extended with multiple subsequent theatre trips (33/10 patients) for stump management.
Conclusions
It was difficult to predict the patients needing an extended amputation. Early MDT and prosthetic rehab service involvement is crucial in LLA decision. When consenting patients for LLA consider a 50% change to extend the initial level of amputation with subsequent theatre trips.
