Abstract
Aim
The aim was to investigate the value of quantitative histological analysis in the diagnosis of fracture-related infection (FRI).
Patients and Methods
The clinical features, microbiology culture results and histological analysis in 156 surgically treated non-unions were used to stratify the likelihood of associated infection. There were 64 confirmed infected non-unions (≥1 confirmatory criteria; pus, sinus and bacterial growth in ≥2 samples), 66 aseptic non-unions (no confirmatory criteria) and 26 possibly infected (pathogen identified from a single specimen and no confirmatory criteria). The histological inflammatory response was assessed by average neutrophil polymorphs (NPs) counts per high power field (HPF) and compared to the established diagnosis.
Results
Assuming a cut-off of >5NPs/HPF for positive histological diagnosis, there was 80% sensitivity and 100% specificity (accuracy 90%). Using a cut-off of any NPs/HPF (>0) for negative histological diagnosis there was a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 85% (accuracy 92%).
Conclusion
Histology can be used in a bimodal fashion as a diagnostic test for FRI. The presence of >5 NPs/HPF has a positive predictive value of 100%, while the complete absence of any NPs is almost always indicative of an aseptic non-union (negative predictive value: 98%).
