Abstract
There is a growing trend towards using pre-clinical models of atrophic non-union. This study investigated different fixation devices, by comparing the mechanical stability at the fracture site of tibia bone fixed by either intramedullary nail, compression plate or external fixator. 40 tibias from adult male Wistar rats' cadavers were osteotomised at the mid-shaft and a gap of 1 mm was created and maintained at the fracture site to simulate criteria of atrophic non-union model. These were divided into five groups (n=8 in each): the first group was fixed with 20G intramedullary nail, the second group with 18G nail, the third group with 4-hole plate, the fourth group with 6-hole plate, and the fifth group with external fixator. Tibia was harvested by leg disarticulation from the knee and ankle joints, the soft tissues were carefully removed from the leg, and tibias were kept hydrated throughout the experiment. Each group was then subdivided into two subgroups for mechanical testing: one for axial loading (n=4) and one for 4-point bending (n=4). Statistical analysis was carried out by ANOVA with a fisher post-hoc comparison between groups. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Axial load to failure data and stiffness data revealed that intramedullary nails are significantly stronger and stiffer than other devices, however there was no statistically significant difference axially between the nail thicknesses. In bending, load to failure revealed that 18G nails are significantly stronger than 20G. We concluded that 18G nail is superior to the other fixation devices, therefore it has been used for in-vivo experiments to create a novel model of atrophic non-union with stable fixation.
