Abstract
Subjective outcomes used in THA show outstanding improvements in patient-reported outcomes. However, recent evidence suggests that there may be a disconnect between patient-reported and objectively measured function. The aim of this study was to investigate if physical activity and sleep patterns change from pre- to six months post primary THA.
54 patients scheduled for THA were recruited. Patients were given a wrist-worn accelerometer (GeneActiv, UK) to wear continuously for one week pre-operatively and six weeks, three months and six months post-operatively. The device was also fitted to the patient immediately following surgery to capture data for the first two post-operative weeks. The following parameters were calculated: (1) sleep efficiency; (2) the amount of time (and length of each bout and fragmentation of the activity) spent in sedentary activity; and (3) time spent in light, moderate and vigorous physical activity.
Sedentary activities showed no change in the number, duration or fragmentation (p= 0.382, 0.288, 0.382, respectively). Patients were sedentary for 5–6 bouts/day with each bout lasting 50–76 minutes/day. A significant main effect was identified for time spent in light intensity activities (p=0.049). Prior to surgery, patients spent 201 minutes/day in light intensity activity. This decreased significantly to 133 minutes/day (p=0.025) in the first two postoperative weeks before returning close to pre-operative levels (192 minutes/day) at six weeks (p=0.025). No further changes were observed in light intensity activities. A significant main effect was identified for time spent in moderate intensity activities (p=0.003). Prior to surgery, patients spent 45 minutes/day in moderate intensity activities. This dropped to 18 minutes/day in the first two postoperative weeks (p=0.190). By three months this had increased to 66 minutes/day (p=0.049). No further changes were seen. There were no significant differences in time spent in vigorous intensity activities (p=0.244). Patients spent <1minute/day in vigorous intensity activities.
Sleep efficiency did not change significantly from pre- (82%) to six months post-operative (75%) (p=0.067) − 85% is typically considered good sleep efficiency. Patients discharged to a regional hospital had significantly poorer sleep efficiency than those discharged home (mean difference=14%, p=<0.001) or to a rehabilitation centre (mean difference=15%, p=0.001).
This patient cohort didn't demonstrate an overall improvement in objectively measured physical activity patterns from pre- to six months post-operative. Sleep efficiency, did not improve and remained sub-optimal.
