header advert
You currently have no access to view or download this content. Please log in with your institutional or personal account if you should have access to through either of these
The Bone & Joint Journal Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from The Bone & Joint Journal

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Get Access locked padlock

Research

IN VITRO HUMAN MONOCYTE RESPONSE TO WEAR PARTICLES OF TITANIUM ALLOY CONTAINING VANADIUM OR NIOBIUM



Download PDF

Abstract

Our aim was to determine whether in vitro studies would detect differences in the cellular response to wear particles of two titanium alloys commonly used in the manufacture of joint replacement prostheses. Particles were of the order of 1 μm in diameter representative of those found adjacent to failed prostheses.

Exposure of human monocytes to titanium 6-aluminium 4- vanadium (TiAlV) at concentrations of 4 x 107 particles/ml produced a mean prostaglandin E2 release of 2627.6 pM; this was significantly higher than the 317.4 pM induced by titanium 6-aluminium 7-niobium alloy (TiAlNb) particles (p = 0.006). Commercially-pure titanium particles induced a release of 347.8 pM. In addition, TiAlV stimulated significantly more release of the other cell mediators, interleukin-1, tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-6. At lower concentrations of particles there was less mediator release and less obvious differences between materials. None of the materials caused significant toxicity.

The levels of inflammatory mediators released by phagocytic cells in response to wear particles may influence the amount of periprosthetic bone loss. Our findings have shown that in vitro studies can detect differences in cellular response induced by particles of similar titanium alloys in common clinical use, although in vivo studies have shown little difference. While in vitro studies should not be used as the only form of assessment, they must be considered when assessing the relative biocompatibility of different implant materials.


Correspondence should be sent to Professor D. W. Howie.

For access options please click here