Abstract
Purpose: We report the satisfactory results obtained in a retrospecive multicentric series of 80 shoulder prostheses implanted for aseptic osetonecrosis of the head of the humerus.
Material and methods: Seventy-four patients (43 men, 31 women, men age 59 years) with aseptic osteonecrosis of the head of the humerus treated with a shoulder prosthesis were reviewed at least two years after surgery. The mean weighted score before surgery was 37%. Twenty-six total prostheses and 54 humeral prostheses were implanted via the deltopectoral approach. There had been few complications at review: seven stiff shoulders, one torn suture of the subscapularis with instability, two inflammatory glenoids, one migration. Physical exam and x-ray (ossifications, lucent lines) findings were recorded.
Results: Mean follow-up was 47 months (24–104 months). The Constant score was improved significantly (p < 0.05). The total weighed score was 88% on the average and was not affected by gender, side, or dominant side. Ninety percent of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied. Gain in motion was significant in all movements with a mean 53° for active anterior elevation. For grade V shoulders, the improvement was significantly better with total shoulder arthroplasty while for grade II and III shoulders a humeral prosthesis was preferable. Full thickness tears of the rotator tendons did not influence overall outcome despite less recovery of motion (p < 0.05) and force (p = 0.09). Complications did not alter results.
Discussion: A humeral prosthesis should be preferred for grade II–III shoulders and a total shoulder arthroplasty for major degeneration of the glenoid (grade V). For grade IV, either prosthesis may be used depending on the patient’s age, activity level, and status of the rotator cuff. For very young or very old patients, high levels of physical activity may argue against prosthesis implantation due to the risk of loosening or rotator cuff tears which are unfavourable factors.
Conclusion: The results of this multicentric series corroborate data in the literature that shoulder arthroplasty provides good results for the treatment of aseptic necrosis of the head of the humerus. In generally, arthroplasty allows pain relief, good motion, particularly for external rotation, and good force recovery, explaining the better results obtained in active younger subjects.
The abstracts were prepared by Docteur Jean Barthas. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Secrétariat de la Société S.O.F.C.O.T., 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris.
