Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu

We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. To find out more about how we use cookies and how to change your settings, see our Privacy Policy.

Accept
Knee

The influence of expectation modification in knee arthroplasty on satisfaction of patients: a randomized controlled trial

the EKSPECT study
CrossMark LogoCrossMark
    Published Online:1 Apr 2021https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B4.BJJ-2020-0629.R3

    Abstract

    Aims

    Meeting preoperative expectations is known to be of major influence on postoperative satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Improved management of expectation, resulting in more realistic expectations can potentially lead to higher postoperative satisfaction. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of an additional preoperative education module, addressing realistic expectations for long-term functional recovery, on postoperative satisfaction and expectation fulfilment.

    Methods

    In total, 204 primary TKA patients with osteoarthritis were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial (RCT). Patients were allocated to either usual preoperative education (control group) or usual education plus an additional module on realistic expectations (intervention group). Primary outcome was being very satisfied (numerical rating scale for satisfaction ≥ 8) with the treatment result at 12 months' follow-up. Other outcomes were change in preoperative expectations and postoperative expectation fulfilment.

    Results

    A total of 187 patients (91.7%) were available for analysis at follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 58.5% (55/94) of patients were very satisfied with the treatment result in the control group, and 69.9% (65/93) of patients in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 3.29). A per-protocol analysis for patients who attended the education session (92.0%, n = 172) showed that 56.9% (49/86) of patients were very satisfied in the control group and 74.4% (61/86) in the intervention group (AOR 2.44, 95% CI 1.21 to 4.91). After preoperative education, the expectation scores in the intervention group were significantly lower (mean difference -6.9 (95% CI -10.2 to -3.6)) and did not alter in the control group (mean difference 0.5 (95% CI -2.9 to 3.9)). Overall, fulfilment of expectations at 12 months was significantly higher in the intervention group (mean difference 11.4% (95% CI 2.3 to 20.5)).

    Conclusion

    Improved preoperative patient education can modify patient expectations, resulting in higher postoperative fulfilment of expectation and higher satisfaction in the group that attended the preoperative education. This is the first RCT to confirm the potential of improved expectation management on satisfaction after TKA.

    Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):619–626.

    References

    • 1. Ruiz D, Koenig L, Dall TM, et al. The direct and indirect costs to society of treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95-A(16):1473–1480. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 2. Tolk JJ, Janssen RPA, Prinsen CAC, et al. The OARSI core set of performance-based measures for knee osteoarthritis is reliable but not valid and responsive. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(9):2898–2909. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 3. Hamilton DF, Lane JV, Gaston P, et al. What determines patient satisfaction with surgery? A prospective cohort study of 4709 patients following total joint replacement. BMJ Open. 2013;3(4):e002525–002528. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 4. Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O. I can't get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):148–152. Link, Google Scholar
    • 5. Vissers MM, de Groot IB, Reijman M, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ, Verhaar JA. Functional capacity and actual daily activity do not contribute to patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(121):121–128. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 6. Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C, Deehan DJ. The rate and predictors of patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty are influenced by the focus of the question: a standard satisfaction question is required. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B(6):740–748. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 7. Kahlenberg CA, Lyman S, Joseph AD, Chiu Y-F, Padgett DE. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes based on implant brand in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B(7_Supple_C):48–54. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 8. Verhaar J. Patient satisfaction after total knee replacement-still a challenge. Acta Orthop. 2020;91(3):241–242. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 9. Mancuso CA, Sculco TP, Wickiewicz TL, et al. Patients' expectations of knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(7):1005–1012. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 10. J Smith E, Soon V-L, Boyd A, McAllister J, Deakin AH, Sarungi M. What do Scottish patients expect of their total knee arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(4):786–792. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 11. Mannion AF, Kämpfen S, Munzinger U, Kramers-de Quervain I. The role of patient expectations in predicting outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(5):R139. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 12. Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? A prospective study of pain and function in 102 patients with 5-year follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2009;80(1):55–61. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 13. Tilbury C, Haanstra TM, Leichtenberg CS, et al. Unfulfilled expectations after total hip and knee arthroplasty surgery: there is a need for better preoperative patient information and education. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10):2139–2145. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 14. Mancuso CA, Graziano S, Briskie LM, et al. Randomized trials to modify patients' preoperative expectations of hip and knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):424–431. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 15. Tolk JJ, Janssen RPA, Haanstra TM, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Reijman M. The EKSPECT study: the influence of expectation modification in knee arthroplasty on satisfaction of patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):437–442. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 16. Lingard EA, Katz JN, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Kinemax Outcomes Group. Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(10):2179–2186. Crossref, Google Scholar
    • 17. Singh JA, O'Byrne M, Harmsen S, Lewallen D. Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA): 4701 TKAs at 2-years and 2935 TKAs at 5-years. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(4):515–521. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 18. Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, McLawhorn AS, Cross MB, Cornell CN, Padgett DE. Patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: a systematic review. Hss J. 2018;14(2):192–201. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 19. van den Akker-Scheek I, van Raay JJAM, Reininga IHF, Bulstra SK, Zijlstra W, Stevens M. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Dutch hip and knee replacement expectations surveys. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11(1):242–251. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 20. Zywiel MG, Mahomed A, Gandhi R, Perruccio AV, Mahomed NN. Measuring expectations in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3446–3456. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 21. de Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, Verhaar JAN, Terwee CB. The Dutch version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:16. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 22. Salaffi F, Stancati A, Silvestri CA, Ciapetti A, Grassi W. Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale. Eur J Pain. 2004;8(4):283–291. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 23. Singh JA, Luo R, Landon GC, Suarez-Almazor M. Reliability and clinically important improvement thresholds for osteoarthritis pain and function scales: a multicenter study. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(3):509–515. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 24. Rabin R, de Charro F, de CF. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–343. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 25. Paulsen A, Roos EM, Pedersen AB, Overgaard S. Minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (pass) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients 1 year postoperatively. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(1):39–48. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 26. Ruyssen-Witrand A, Fernandez-Lopez CJ, Gossec L, Anract P, Courpied JP, Dougados M. Psychometric properties of the OARSI/OMERACT osteoarthritis pain and functional impairment scales: ICOAP, KOOS-PS and HOOS-PS. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(2):231–237. Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 27. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 28. Spinhoven P, Ormel J, Sloekers PP, Kempen GI, Speckens AE, Van Hemert AM. A validation study of the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997;27(2):363–370. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 29. Kahan BC, Morris TP. Reporting and analysis of trials using stratified randomisation in leading medical journals: review and reanalysis. BMJ. 2012;345(7879):e5840–5848. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 30. Kennedy D, Wainwright A, Pereira L, et al. A qualitative study of patient education needs for hip and knee replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):413–422. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 31. Jain D, Nguyen LL, Bendich I, et al. Higher Patient Expectations Predict Higher Patient-Reported Outcomes, But Not Satisfaction, in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Prospective Multicenter Study. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(9S):S166–S170. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 32. Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJK, Robertson BW. Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(12):3854–3860. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 33. Culliton SE, Bryant DM, MacDonald SJ, Hibbert KM, Chesworth BM. Effect of an e-learning tool on expectations and satisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7):2153–2158. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 34. Flood AB, Lorence DP, Ding J, McPherson K, Black NA. The role of expectations in patients' reports of post-operative outcomes and improvement following therapy. Med Care. 1993;31(11):1043–1056. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 35. Colloca L, Miller FG. Harnessing the placebo effect: the need for translational research. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1572):1922–1930. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 36. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Thomas H. The role of expectancies in the placebo effect and their use in the delivery of health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(3):1–96. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
    • 37. Ebrahim S, Malachowski C, Kamal El Din M, et al. Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):240–255. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 38. Lingard EA, Sledge CB, Learmonth ID, Kinemax Outcomes Group. Patient expectations regarding total knee arthroplasty: differences among the United States, United Kingdom, and Australia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88-A(6):1201–1207. Google Scholar
    • 39. Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Medical and psychological comorbidity predicts poor pain outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Rheumatology. 2013;52(5):916–923. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 40. Tolk JJ, Janssen RPA, Haanstra TM, van der Steen MMC, Bierma Zeinstra SMA, Reijman M. Outcome expectations of total knee arthroplasty patients: the influence of demographic factors, pain, personality traits, physical and psychological status. J Knee Surg. 2020;33(10):1034–1040. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 41. Tolk JJ, Waarsing JEH, Janssen RPA, van Steenbergen LN, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Reijman M. Development of preoperative prediction models for pain and functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty using the Dutch arthroplasty register data. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(3):690–698. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 42. Scott CEH, Oliver WM, MacDonald D, Wade FA, Moran M, Breusch SJ. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(12):1625–1634. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
    • 43. van der Sluis G, Goldbohm RA, Elings JE, et al. Pre-operative functional mobility as an independent determinant of inpatient functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty during three periods that coincided with changes in clinical pathways. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(2):211–217. Link, Google Scholar

    Submit a Letter to the Editor about this article