Functional rehabilitation has become an increasingly popular treatment for Achilles tendon rupture (ATR), providing comparably low re-rupture rates to surgery, while avoiding risks of surgical complications. Limited evidence exists on whether gap size should affect patient selection for this treatment option. The aim of this study was to assess if size of gap between ruptured tendon ends affects patient-reported outcome following ATR treated with functional rehabilitation.

Methods

Analysis of prospectively collected data on all 131 patients diagnosed with ATR at Royal Berkshire Hospital, UK, from August 2016 to January 2019 and managed non-operatively was performed. Diagnosis was confirmed on all patients by dynamic ultrasound scanning and gap size measured with ankle in full plantarflexion. Functional rehabilitation using an established protocol was the preferred treatment. All non-operatively treated patients with completed Achilles Tendon Rupture Scores (ATRS) at a minimum of 12 months following injury were included.

Results

In all, 82 patients with completed ATRS were included in the analysis. Their mean age was 51 years (standard deviation (SD) 14). The mean ATRS was 76 (SD 19) at a mean follow-up of 20 months (SD 11) following injury. Gap inversely affected ATRS with a Pearson’s correlation of -0.30 (p = 0.008). Mean ATRS was lower with gaps > 5 mm compared with ≤ 5 mm (73 (SD 21) vs 82 (SD 16); p = 0.031). Mean ATRS was lowest (70 (SD 23)) with gaps > 10 mm, with significant differences in perceived strength and pain. The overall re-rupture rate was two out of 131 (1.5%).

Conclusion

Increasing gap size predicts lower patient-reported outcome, as measured by ATRS. Tendon gap > 5 mm may be a useful predictor in physically demanding individuals, and tendon gap > 10 mm for those with low physical demand. Further studies that control for gap size when comparing non-operative and operative treatment are required to assess if these patients may benefit from surgery, particularly when balanced against the surgical risks.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(11):1535–1541.

References

1. Ganestam A, Kallemose T, Troelsen A, et al. Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013. A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients. knee surgery, sports Traumatology. Arthroscopy. 2016;24(12):3730–3737. Google Scholar
2. Sheth U, Wasserstein D, Jenkinson R, et al. The epidemiology and trends in management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures in Ontario, Canada. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(1):78–86. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
3. Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Rolf C, et al. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2419–2423. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
4. Houshian S, Tscherning T, Riegels-Nielsen P. The epidemiology of Achilles tendon rupture in a Danish County. Injury. 1998;29(9):651–654. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
5. Leppilahti J, Orava S. Total achilles tendon rupture. A review. Sports Med. 1998;25(2):79–100. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
6. Maffulli N, Waterston SW, Squair J, et al. Changing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Scotland: A 15-year study. Clin J Sport Med. 1999;9(3):157–160. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
7. Ochen Y, Beks RB, Van Heijl M, et al. Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;364:k5120. Google Scholar
8. Lemme NJ, Li NY, DeFroda SF, et al. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures in the United States: athletic and Nonathletic injuries from 2012 to 2016. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(11):2325967118808238. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
9. Kannus P, Natri A. Etiology and pathophysiology of tendon ruptures in sports. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;7(2):107–112. Crossref, Google Scholar
10. Gwynne-Jones DP, Sims M, Handcock D. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute achilles tendon rupture with operative or nonoperative treatment using an identical functional bracing protocol. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32(4):337–343. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
11. Kim GK. The risk of Fluoroquinolone-induced tendinopathy and tendon rupture: what does the clinician need to know? J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010;3(4):49–54. Medline, Google Scholar
12. Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Rolf C, et al. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2419–2423. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
13. Mattila VM, Huttunen TT, Haapasalo H, et al. Declining incidence of surgery for Achilles tendon rupture follows publication of major RCTs: evidence-influenced change evident using the Finnish registry study. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(16):1084–1086. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
14. Willits K, Amendola A, Bryant D, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(17):2767–2775. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
15. Wang D, Sandlin MI, Cohen JR, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: An analysis of 12,570 patients in a large healthcare database. Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;21(4):250–253. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
16. Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(23):2136–2143. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
17. Barfod KW, Bencke J, Lauridsen HB, et al. Nonoperative, dynamic treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: influence of early weightbearing on biomechanical properties of the plantar flexor muscle-tendon complex-a blinded, randomized, controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(2):220–226. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
18. Schepull T, Aspenberg P. Early controlled tension improves the material properties of healing human Achilles tendons after ruptures: a randomized trial. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(11):2550–2557. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
19. Krapf D, Kaipel M, Majewski M. Structural and biomechanical characteristics after early mobilization in an achilles tendon rupture model: Operative versus nonoperative treatment. Orthopedics. 2012;35(9):e1383–e1388. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
20. McCormack R, Bovard J. Early functional rehabilitation or cast immobilisation for the postoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Vol. 49, British Journal of sports medicine. BMJ. 2015:1329–1335. Google Scholar
21. Ecker TM, Bremer AK, Krause FG, et al. Prospective use of a standardized Nonoperative early Weightbearing protocol for Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(4):1004–1010. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
22. Barfod KW, Bencke J, Lauridsen HB, et al. Nonoperative dynamic treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: the influence of early weight-bearing on clinical outcome: a blinded, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(18):1497–1503. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar
23. Huang J, Wang C, Ma X, et al. Rehabilitation regimen after surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(4):1008–1016. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
24. Costa ML, Achten J, Marian IR, et al. Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Lancet. 2020;395(10222):441–448. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
25. Westin O, Nilsson Helander K, Grävare Silbernagel K, et al. Acute ultrasonography investigation to predict Reruptures and outcomes in patients with an Achilles tendon rupture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(10):232596711666792. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
26. Kotnis R, David S, Handley R, et al. Dynamic ultrasound as a selection tool for reducing Achilles tendon reruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34(9):1395–1400. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
27. Thermann H, Zwipp H, Tscherne H. Functional treatment concept of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. Two years results of a prospective randomized study. Unfallchirurg. 1995;98(1):21–32. Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
28. Hutchison AM, Topliss C, Beard D, et al. The treatment of a rupture of the Achilles tendon using a dedicated management programme. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B(4):510–515. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
29. Lawrence JE, Nasr P, Fountain DM, et al. Functional outcomes of conservatively managed acute ruptures of the Achilles tendon. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B(1):87–93. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
30. Nilsson-Helander K, Thomeé R, Silbernagel KG, et al. The Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS): development and validation. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(3):421–426. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
31. Silbernagel KG, Crossley KM. A proposed Return-to-Sport program for patients with Midportion Achilles tendinopathy: rationale and implementation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015;45(11):876–886. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
32. Hansen MS, Nilsson Helander K, Karlsson J, Barfod KW. Performance of the Achilles tendon total rupture score over time in a large national database: development of an instruction manual for accurate use. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(6):1423–1429. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
33. Hansen MS, Helander KN, Karlsson J, et al. 20 The achilles tendon total rupture score should be used with caution the first 6 months after injury. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(Suppl 1):A7–8. Google Scholar
34. Aujla RS, Patel S, Jones A, Bhatia M. Non-operative functional treatment for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: The Leicester Achilles Management Protocol (LAMP). Injury. 2019;50(4):995–999. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
35. Wallace RGH, Heyes GJ, Michael ALR. The non-operative functional management of patients with a rupture of the tendo Achillis leads to low rates of re-rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93-B(10):1362–1366. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
36. Arverud ED, Anundsson P, Hardell E, et al. Ageing, deep vein thrombosis and male gender predict poor outcome after acute Achilles tendon rupture. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(12):1635–1641. Link, ISI, Google Scholar
37. Olsson N, Petzold M, Brorsson A, et al. Predictors of clinical outcome after acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(6):1448–1455. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
38. Aujla R, Patel S, Jones A, Bhatia M. Predictors of functional outcome in non-operatively managed Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24(4):336–341. Crossref, Medline, ISI, Google Scholar
39. Silbernagel KG, Brorsson A, Olsson N, et al. Sex differences in outcome after an acute Achilles tendon rupture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(6):232596711558676. Crossref, ISI, Google Scholar
40. Olsson N, Nilsson-Helander K, Karlsson J, et al. Major functional deficits persist two years after acute Achilles tendon rupture. knee surgery, sports Traumatology. Arthroscopy. 2011;19(8):1385–1393. Google Scholar

Vol. 102-B, No. 11

Supplemental Materials

Metrics

Downloaded 776 times

History

Published online 31 October 2020

Published in print 1 November 2020

Information

Keywords

PDF download