We use cookies to give you the best experience on our website. To find out more about how we use cookies and how to change your settings, see our Privacy Policy.

Accept

Prevalence of isolated gastrocnemius tightness in patients with foot and ankle pathology

a population-based study

    Aims

    Gastrocnemius tightness predisposes to musculoskeletal pathology and may require surgical treatment. However, it is not clear what proportion of patients with foot and ankle pathology have clinically significant gastrocnemius tightness. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and degree of gastrocnemius tightness in a control group of patients with a group of patients with foot and ankle pathology.

    Patients and Methods

    This prospective, case-matched, observational study compared gastrocnemius tightness, as assessed by the lunge test, in a control group and a group with foot and ankle pathology. Gastrocnemius tightness was calculated as the difference in dorsiflexion of the ankle with the knee extended and flexed.

    Results

    A total of 291 controls were paired with 97 patients with foot and ankle pathology (FAP). The mean gastrocnemius tightness was 6.0° (sd 3.5) in controls and 8.0° (sd 5.7) in the FAP group (p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a mean gastrocnemius tightness of 10.3° (sd 6.0) in patients with forefoot pathology versus 6.9° (sd 5.3) in patients with other pathology (p = 0.008). A total of 12 patients (37.5%) with forefoot pathology had gastrocnemius tightness of > two standard deviations of the control group (> 13°).

    Conclusion

    Gastrocnemius tightness of > 13° may be considered abnormal. Most patients with foot and ankle pathology do not have abnormal degrees of gastrocnemius tightness compared with controls, but it is present in over a third of patients with forefoot pathology.

    Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:945–52.

    References

    • 1 DiGiovanni CW , Kuo R , Tejwani N, et al. . Isolated gastrocnemius tightness. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002;84-A:962–970. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 2 Pascual Huerta J. The effect of the gastrocnemius on the plantar fascia. Foot Ankle Clin 2014;19:701–718. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 3 Malliaras P , Cook JL , Kent P. Reduced ankle dorsiflexion range may increase the risk of patellar tendon injury among volleyball players. J Sci Med Sport 2006;9:304–309. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 4 You JY , Lee HM , Luo HJ, et al. . Gastrocnemius tightness on joint angle and work of lower extremity during gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009;24:744–750. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 5 McGregor AH , Hukins DW. Lower limb involvement in spinal function and low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2009;22:219–222. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 6 Barske HL , DiGiovanni BF , Douglass M , Nawoczenski DA. Current concepts review: isolated gastrocnemius contracture and gastrocnemius recession. Foot Ankle Int 2012;33:915–921. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 7 Cychosz CC , Phisitkul P , Belatti DA , Glazebrook MA , DiGiovanni CW. Gastrocnemius recession for foot and ankle conditions in adults: evidence-based recommendations. Foot Ankle Surg 2015;21:77–85. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 8 Barouk P. Technique, indications, and results of proximal medial gastrocnemius lengthening. Foot Ankle Clin 2014;19:795–806. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 9 Baumbach SF , Brumann M , Binder J, et al. . The influence of knee position on ankle dorsiflexion - a biometric study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:246. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 10 Hill RS. Ankle equinus. Prevalence and linkage to common foot pathology. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1995;85:295–300. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 11 Baumbach SF , Braunstein M , Seeliger F, et al. . Ankle dorsiflexion: what is normal? Development of a decision pathway for diagnosing impaired ankle dorsiflexion and M. gastrocnemius tightness. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2016;136:1203–1211. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 12 Jastifer JR , Marston J. Gastrocnemius contracture in patients with and without foot pathology. Foot Ankle Int 2016;37:1165–1170. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 13 Krause DA , Cloud BA , Forster LA , Schrank JA , Hollman JH. Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion: a comparison of active and passive techniques in multiple positions. J Sport Rehabil 2011;20:333–344. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 14 Konor MM , Morton S , Eckerson JM , Grindstaff TL. Reliability of three measures of ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012;7:279–287. MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 15 Denegar CR , Hertel J , Fonseca J. The effect of lateral ankle sprain on dorsiflexion range of motion, posterior talar glide, and joint laxity. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002;32:166–173. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 16 Aronow MS , Diaz-Doran V , Sullivan RJ , Adams DJ. The effect of triceps surae contracture force on plantar foot pressure distribution. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27:43–52. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 17 Abbassian A , Kohls-Gatzoulis J , Solan MC. Proximal medial gastrocnemius release in the treatment of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int 2012;33:14–19. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 18 Maskill JD , Bohay DR , Anderson JG. Gastrocnemius recession to treat isolated foot pain. Foot Ankle Int 2010;31:19–23. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 19 Nawoczenski DA , Barske H , Tome J, et al. . Isolated gastrocnemius recession for achilles tendinopathy: strength and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2015;97-A:99–105. Crossref, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 20 Solan MC , Carne A , Davies MS. Gastrocnemius shortening and heel pain. Foot Ankle Clin 2014;19:719–738. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 21 Gurdezi S , Kohls-Gatzoulis J , Solan MC. Results of proximal medial gastrocnemius release for Achilles tendinopathy. Foot Ankle Int 2013;34:1364–1369. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 22 Bennell KL , Talbot RC , Wajswelner H, et al. . Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Aust J Physiother 1998;44:175–180. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 23 Thornton J , Sabah S , Segaren N, et al. . Validated method for measuring functional range of motion in patients with ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 2016;37:868–873. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 24 Baumbach SF , Braunstein M , Regauer M , Böcker W , Polzer H. Diagnosis of musculus gastrocnemius tightness - key factors for the clinical examination. J Vis Exp 2016;113.:. Google Scholar
    • 25 Barouk P , Barouk LS. Clinical diagnosis of gastrocnemius tightness. Foot Ankle Clin 2014;19:659–667. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 26 Agyapong-Badu S , Warner M , Samuel D , Stokes M. Measurement of ageing effects on muscle tone and mechanical properties of rectus femoris and biceps brachii in healthy males and females using a novel hand-held myometric device. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2016;62:59–67. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar
    • 27 Klein EE , Weil L Jr , Weil LS Sr , Fleischer AE. Body mass index and achilles tendonitis: a 10-year retrospective analysis. Foot Ankle Spec 2013;6:276–282. Crossref, MedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 28 Radford JA , Burns J , Buchbinder R , Landorf KB , Cook C. Does stretching increase ankle dorsiflexion range of motion? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2006;40:870–875. Crossref, Medline, ISIGoogle Scholar