header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Research

EFFECT OF HIP IMPLANT POSITIONING ON EDGE-LOADING OCCURRENCE AND SEVERITY

European Orthopaedic Research Society (EORS) 2015, Annual Conference, 2–4 September 2015. Part 1.



Abstract

Background

Many factors contribute to the occurrence of edge-loading conditions in hip replacement; soft tissue tension, surgical position, patient biomechanical variations and type of activities, hip design, etc. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of different levels of rotational and translational surgical positioning of hip replacement bearings on the occurrence and severity of edge-loading and the resultant wear rates.

Method

The Leeds II Hip-Joint Simulator and 36mm diameter alumina matrix composite ceramic bearings (BIOLOX delta, DePuy Synthes, UK) were used in this study. Different levels of mismatch between the reconstructed rotational centres of the head and the cup were considered (2, 3 and 4mm) in the medial-lateral axis. Two cup inclination angles were investigated; an equivalent to 45 and 65 degrees in-vivo, thus six conditions (n=6 for each condition) were studied in total with three million cycles completed for each condition. The wear of the ceramic-on-ceramic bearings were determined using a microbalance (Mettler Toledo, XP205, UK) and the dynamic microseparation displacement was measured using a Liner Variable Differential Transformer.

Results

When a translational joint centre mismatch was coupled with a higher cup inclination angle, the severity of edge-loading increased when compared with the effect of those variables applied individually. Increasing the medial-lateral joint centre mismatch from 2 to 3 to 4mm resulted in increased wear rates under both cup inclination angles, with the 65 degree cup inclination angle having significantly higher wear rate than the cup inclination angle of 45 degree (p=0.02, p=0.02, and p<0.01 respectively).

Conclusion

The cups with a 45 degree inclination angle showed greater resistance to dynamic microseparation as a result of joint centre mismatch. This study demonstrated that optimal position should not only consider the rotational position of the acetabular cup but also the relative centres of rotation of the head and the cup.

Disclosure

John Fisher is a paid consultant to DePuy Synthes. Jonathan Thompson and Graham H. Issac are employees at DePuy Synthes.