Abstract
Introduction
Quadriceps performance following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a critical factor in patient satisfaction that can be significantly affected by implant design (Greene, 2008). The objective of this study was to compare quadriceps efficiency (QE) following TKA with a medial-pivot system (EVOLUTION®, MicroPort Orthopedics Inc., Arlington, TN, USA) to non-implanted control measurements.
Methods
Five cadaveric leg specimens with no prior surgeries, deformities, or disease were obtained. Each was placed in a custom closed chain device and loaded to simulate a heel-up squat from full-extension to deep flexion (approximately 115°) and back to full extension. Quadriceps force (FQ) and ground reaction force (FZ) were measured, and the ratio of the two was calculated as the quadriceps load factor (QLF). QFLs are inversely related to QE, with higher QFLs representing reduced efficiency. Each specimen was then implanted with a medial-pivot implant by a board certified orthopedic surgeon and force measurements were repeated. Mean pre- (represents control values) and post-implantation QFLs were compared to determine any differences in QE throughout the range of motion.
Results
Mean QFLs were not statistically different for pre- and post-implantation measurements throughout loading (Figure 1). QE was increased in the post-implantation measurements compared to pre-implantation between approximately 80° and 115° flexion and reduced between 5° and 80°. The mean peak post-implantation QFL was 5% less than that measured pre-implantation.
Discussion
Quadriceps muscles were least efficient during peak flexion (80°–115°) when FQ was highest during both pre- and post-implantation measurements. The similar QE seen between the pre- and post-implantation measurements for most of the range of motion could be a result of the system design, which seeks to mimic the kinematics of the normal knee (Schmidt, 2003). The observed nearly-linear change in the FQ through 75° is likely due to the combination of the medial spherical radius and the conformity of the medial tibial insert socket that provides a constant moment arm on which the extensor mechanism can act. The primary driver of decreasing efficiency of the extensor mechanism is the increasing moment arm of the load with increasing flexion. The second increase in FQ in deep flexion (>110°) for the implanted measurements is likely due to the smaller closing radius on the femoral component in this range. These preliminary data have the potential to be significant clinically in that decreased QE may result in increased quadriceps forces manifesting in anterior knee pain or patient fatigue. Additionally, increased QE may play a role in rehabilitation and return to activities of daily living. The current results show the medial-pivot system may increase QE during peak flexion and does not significantly reduce QE during midflexion when compared to control. In-vivo testing is needed to confirm if these results translate to clinical practice.
