header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

THE ULNAR NERVE IN TOTAL ELBOW ARTHROPLASTY: OUTCOMES AFTER IN-SITU RELEASE

The South African Orthopaedic Association (SAOA) 60th Annual Congress



Abstract

Aim:

To investigate the incidence of post-operative ulna nerve symptoms in total elbow arthroplasty after full in-situ release.

Methods:

A retrospective review was completed of the medical records of eighty-three consecutive primary total elbow arthroplasties (TEA) performed between 2003 and 2012. Data analysed included the presence of pre-operative ulnar nerve (UN) symptoms, history of prior UN transposition, intra-operative management of the UN and presence of post-operative symptoms.

Results:

One patient had a prior UN transposition. The nerve was transposed at time of TEA in 4 of the 83 elbows (4.8%). The indication for transposition in all 4 cases was abnormal tracking or increased tension on the nerve after insertion of the prosthesis. The remaining 78 TEA's all received a full in-situ release of the nerve. The incidence of post-operative UN symptoms in this group was 7.7% (6/78). Four neuropraxias resolved in the early post-operative period, whilst two patients (2.6%) continued to experience significant UN symptoms requiring subsequent transposition, at 6 weeks and 12 months post TEA.

Conclusion:

A 2.6% incidence of significant post-operative UN symptoms compares favourably with systematic reviews in the literature (3–11% incidence of UN complications). We do not believe routine transposition, which adds to the handling of the nerve and increases total surgical time, is necessary, and should be reserved for cases where intra-operative assessment by the surgeon deems it necessary.