Abstract
AIS is present in 3–5% of the general population. Large curves are associated with increased pain and reduced quality of life. However, no information is available on the impact of smaller curves, many of which do not reach secondary care. The objective of this project was to identify whether or not there is any hidden burden of disease associated with smaller spinal curves.
The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a population-based birth cohort that recruited over 14,000 pregnant women from the Bristol area between 1991–1992 and has followed up their offspring regularly. At aged 15 presence or absence of spinal curvature ≥6degrees was identified using the validated DXA Scoliosis Measure in 5299 participants. At aged 18 a structured pain questionnaire was administered to 4083 participants. Chi-squared was used to investigate any association between presence of a spinal curve at aged 15 and self-reported pain at aged 18 years. Sensitivity analyses were performed by rerunning analyses after excluding those who were told at aged 13 they had a spinal curve (n=27), and using a higher spinal curve cut-off of ≥10degrees.
Full data was available for 3184 participants. Of these, 56.8% were female, and 4.2% non-white reflecting the local population. 202 (6.3%) had a spinal curve ≥6degrees and 125 (3.9%) had a curve ≥10degrees. The mean curve size was 12degrees. 140/202 (69.3%) had single curves, and 57.4% of these were to the right. In total 46.3% of the 3184 participants reported aches and pains that lasted for a day or longer in the previous month, consistent with previous literature. 16.3% reported back pain. Those with spinal curves ≥6degrees were 42% more likely to report back pain than those without (OR 1.42, 95%CI 1.00 to 2.02, P=0.047). In addition, those with spinal curves had more days off school, were more likely to avoid activities that caused their pain, were more likely to think that something harmful is happening when they get the pain, and were more afraid of the pain than people without spinal curves (P<0.05). Sensitivity analyses did not change results.
We present the first results from a population-based study of the impact of small spinal curves and identify an important hidden burden of disease. Our results highlight that small scoliotic curves that may not present to secondary care are nonetheless associated with increased pain, more days off school and avoidance of activities.
