Abstract
Background
Carbon fibre (CF) instrumentation is known to be radiolucent and has a tensile strength similar to metal. A specific use could be primary or oligometastatic cancer where regular surveillance imaging and Stereotactic Radiotherapy are required.
CT images are inherently more prone to artefacts which affect Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements. Titanium (Ti) screws scatter more artefacts. Until now it has been difficult to quantify how advantageous the radiolucency of carbon fibre pedicle screws compared to titanium or metallic screws actually is.
Methodology
In this retrospective study, conducted on patients from 2018 to 2020 in SGH, we measured the HU to compare the artifact produced by CF versus Ti pedicle screws and rods implanted in age and sex matched group of patients with oligometastatic spinal disease.
Results
Eleven patients were included in each group. We compared the change of HU between preoperative and postoperative cases of both CF & Ti screws, which clearly shows Ti screws scatter lot more artefacts than CF screws.
We are proposing a CT artefact grading system from grade 0 to grade 4 based on the percentage change of HU for unequivocal understanding of the CT artefacts.
Conclusion
This study clearly shows the artefacts produced by the metallic implants are significantly higher than the carbon fibre implants. Considering the efficacy of the RT and the increased life expectancy as a consequence, carbon instrumentation MAY BE superior to titanium or metallic instrumentation. The artefact grading system will help the clinicians in describing and planning where the artefacts need to be factorized.
