header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Spine

CURRENT CONCEPTS IN MANAGEMENT OF SPINAL HAEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES: A SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE

NSpine 5th Major Multi-Disclipinary Spine Conference, held online, 13–16 July 2021.



Abstract

Introduction

Spine is a common site for haematological malignancies. Multiple myeloma affects the spine in 70% of cases. New guidelines were published in 2015 to help manage spinal haematological malignancies.

Despite neural compression or spinal instability, instrumentation of the spine should be avoided. Surgery carries significant risks of wound complications and more importantly delaying the definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cement augmentation and bracing for pain and prevention of deformity is key to the new strategies.

We aimed to evaluate the different treatment modalities adopted in the spine unit at St George's hospital for spinal haematological malignancies. We compared our practice to the current guidelines published in 2015.

Methods

Retrospective review of all spinal haematological malignancy patients who were discussed in the spinal MDT and managed through the spine unit at St George's hospital in the period between April 2019 and February 2021. We analysed the demographics of the patients treated in this period and compared the management modalities adopted in the unit to the current British haematological guidelines.

Results

139 patients were included in this study, 61.9% of them were male. 70 cases came through the MSCC pathway. 15 patients had their spinal involvement in the lumbar spine only below the conus. The Bilsky Grades of the other 124 cases were B0: 35.97 % 1a: 4.31%%, 1b: 7.19%, 1c: 3.59%, 2: 5.75% 3: 32.37%. 43 patients (30.9 %) had neurological deficits on presentation.

70 cases were treated conservatively (50.35%), 21 were treated with brace only (15.1%), 25 had BKP (17.98%) and 23 were treated with instrumentation (16.54%)

The number of instrumented cases was small and trending down and cement augmentation and bracing were more frequently chosen for these patients. This comes in accordance to the British haematological guidelines.

Conclusion

Utilising BJH 2015 guidelines we have reduced our instrumented operative case load. There is a higher percentage of BKP and Bracing in accordance to the algorithm.


*Email: