header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

General Orthopaedics

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF EFFICACY USING POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION LATERAL-FLOW ASSAY FOR GRAM-POSITIVE AND GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIAL INFECTION DETECTION IN JOINT FLUID

European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), Nantes, France, September 2017



Abstract

Aim

We used a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) lateral flow assay1) to rapidly diagnose joint infection. We evaluated the usefulness of multiplex-PCR (PCR lateral flow assay: PCR-LF) using detailed clinical data.

Method

A total of 35 synovial fluid samples were collected from 26 patients in whom bacterial infection was suspected, including 22 from knee joints, 11 from hip joints, and 2 from other joints. After purifying the DNA from the samples, multiplex PCR targeting two MRSA-associated genes (femA and mecA) and the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was performed. Amplified gene fragments were specifically detected with DNA probes immobilized on stick devices through DNA-DNA hybridization and visualization, enabling diagnosis of MRSA, MSSA, MRCNS, gram-positive, and/or gram-negative bacterial infection. Genetic identification of bacteria by determining the 16S rRNA gene sequence was also performed using multiplex PCR-positive samples. Finally, the usefulness of our PCR-LF method was evaluated using detailed clinical data.

Results

The results of PCR-LF were 9 gram-positive and 1 gram-negative bacterial infections. Eleven bacterial species were identified based on 16S rRNA gene sequences. Ten (90.9%)of the eleven samples (bacterial species) were identified using our PCR-LF. Five samples were detected in bacterial cultures; two are MSSA, one is Streptococcus agalactiae, one is Escherichia coli, one is Prevotella oralis. We diagnosed 6 samples as clinical infections. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of the culture tests were 83% and 100%, respectively, while for PCR-LF, these values were 83% and 83%.

Conclusions

PCR-LF is highly sensitive and effective for the rapid diagnosis of joint infection; however, dead bacteria may also be detected. Moreover, because the target bacterial species are limited, clinical diagnosis based on the results of multiple examinations is necessary.


E-mail: