header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

EPIPHYSIOLYSIS WITH MAJOR DISPLACEMENT: ANTERIOR SURGICAL REDUCTION



Abstract

Purpose: Treatment of femoral epiphysiolysis with major displacement remains a controversial subject. Open repositioning of the epiphysis via a lateral approach as proposed by Dunn allows nearly anatomic restitution but with a high rate of complications. We report our experience with open repositions via an anterior approach which has been more reliable in our hands.

Material and methods: During the last decade, we operated nine hips for epiphysiolysis with major displacement, using the anterior approach to spare the medial circumflex artery. External reduction was not attempted. Preoperative and residual displacement were evaluated using the Southwick technique and according to the position of the femoral head in relation to the Klein line. Early after surgery, a bone scintigram was obtained for all hips. We followed these patients to bone maturity, with a mean follow-up of four years.

Results: The early postoperative scintigrams did not reveal any case of insufficient uptake in the femoral head. Mean correction was 43° on the lateral view, with a mean preoperative displacement of 72°. Mean residual displacement after surgery was 23°. After repositioning, position of the epiphysis in relation to the Klein line was not significantly different from the position observed on the healthy side. Postoperatively, leg length discrepancy was 1 cm. At last follow-up, there have been no signs of osteonecrosis, chondrolysis or osteoarthritic degeneration. At mean 44 months follow-up, all of the patients have unlimited activities, including sports. Only one patient complained of mild climate-related pain.

Discussion: Compared with the lateral approach with trochanterotomy as proposed by Dunn, we have found the anterior approach technically easier and more reliable in terms of protecting the epiphyseal blood supply. The correction obtained, voluntarily preserving a certain degree of under-correction, associated with resection of a portion of the neck enables repositioning without risking vessel stress. Use of a stable internal fixation which allows early mobilisation would be an explanation of the absence of postoperative chondrolysis.

Conclusion: These results appear to be sufficiently encouraging to advocate this technique previously described by PH Martin in 1948.

Correspondence should be addressed to SOFCOT, 56 rue Boissonade, 75014 Paris, France.