The principle strategies of fracture-related infection (FRI) treatment are debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant retention (DAIR) or debridement, antimicrobial therapy, and implant removal/exchange. Increasing the period between fracture fixation and FRI revision surgery is believed to be associated with higher failure rates after DAIR. However, a clear time-related cut-off has never been scientifically defined. This systematic review analyzed the influence of the interval between fracture fixation and FRI revision surgery on success rates after DAIR. A systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, in PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection, investigating the outcome after DAIR procedures of long bone FRIs in clinical studies published until January 2020.Aims
Methods
To analyse the effectiveness of debridement and implant retention
(DAIR) in patients with hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)
and the relationship to patient characteristics. The outcome was
evaluated in hips with confirmed PJI and a follow-up of not less
than two years. Patients in whom DAIR was performed were identified from our
hip arthroplasty register (between 2004 and 2013). Adherence to
criteria for DAIR was assessed according to a previously published
algorithm.Aims
Patients and Methods
The treatment of peri-prosthetic joint infection
(PJI) of the ankle is not standardised. It is not clear whether
an algorithm developed for hip and knee PJI can be used in the management
of PJI of the ankle. We evaluated the outcome, at two or more years
post-operatively, in 34 patients with PJI of the ankle, identified
from a cohort of 511 patients who had undergone total ankle replacement.
Their median age was 62.1 years (53.3 to 68.2), and 20 patients
were women. Infection was exogenous in 28 (82.4%) and haematogenous
in six (17.6%); 19 (55.9%) were acute infections and 15 (44.1%)
chronic. Staphylococci were the cause of 24 infections (70.6%).
Surgery with retention of one or both components was undertaken
in 21 patients (61.8%), both components were replaced in ten (29.4%),
and arthrodesis was undertaken in three (8.8%). An infection-free
outcome with satisfactory function of the ankle was obtained in
23 patients (67.6%). The best rate of cure followed the exchange
of both components (9/10, 90%). In the 21 patients in whom one or
both components were retained, four had a relapse of the same infecting organism
and three had an infection with another organism. Hence the rate
of cure was 66.7% (14 of 21). In these 21 patients, we compared
the treatment given to an algorithm developed for the treatment
of PJI of the knee and hip. In 17 (80.9%) patients, treatment was
not according to the algorithm. Most (11 of 17) had only one criterion against
retention of one or both components. In all, ten of 11 patients
with severe soft-tissue compromise as a single criterion had a relapse-free
survival. We propose that the treatment concept for PJI of the ankle
requires adaptation of the grading of quality of the soft tissues. Cite this article
