To validate the Sydney Hamstring Origin Rupture Evaluation (SHORE), a hamstring-specific clinical assessment tool to evaluate patient outcomes following surgical treatment. A prospective study of 70 unilateral hamstring surgical repairs, with a mean age of 47.3 years (15 to 73). Patients completed the SHORE preoperatively and at six months post-surgery, and then completed both the SHORE and Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT) at three years post-surgery. The SHORE questionnaire was validated through the evaluation of its psychometric properties, including; internal consistency, reproducibility, reliability, sensitivity to change, and ceiling effect. Construct validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation analysis to examine the strength of association between the SHORE and the PHAT.Aims
Methods
Incomplete avulsion of the proximal hamstrings
can be a severely debilitating injury that causes weakness, pain
while sitting and inability to run. The results of the surgical treatment
of 23 consecutive patients with such injuries at least two years
after surgery are described. The surgery consisted of the repair
of the hamstrings directly onto the ischial tuberosity. At review,
using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 to 100), pain while sitting improved
from a mean of 40 (0 to 100) to 64 (0 to 100) (p = 0.024), weakness
from a mean of 39 (0 to 90) to 76 (7 to 100) (p = 0.0001) and the
ability to run from a mean of 24 (0 to 88) to 64 (0 to 95) (p =
0.0001). According to a VAS, satisfaction was rated at a mean of
81 (0 to 100) and 20 patients (87%) would have the same procedure
again. Hamstring strength measured pre- and post-operatively had
improved significantly from a mean of 64% (0% to 95%) to 88% (50%
to 114%) compared with the normal side. Most of these patients with symptomatic incomplete hamstring
avulsions unresponsive to conservative treatment had an improved
outcome after surgical repair.
