This study reports the ten-year wear rates, incidence of osteolysis, clinical outcomes, and complications of a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing oxidized zirconium (OxZr) versus cobalt-chrome (CoCr) femoral heads with ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients undergoing primary THA were recruited from four institutions and prospectively allocated to the following treatment groups: Group A, CoCr femoral head with XLPE liner; Group B, OxZr femoral head with XLPE liner; and Group C, OxZr femoral head with UHMWPE liner. All study patients and assessors recording outcomes were blinded to the treatment groups. The outcomes of 262 study patients were analyzed at ten years’ follow-up.Aims
Methods
Oxidised zirconium (OxZi) has been developed
as an alternative bearing surface for femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty
(THA). This study has investigated polyethylene wear, functional
outcomes and complications, comparing OxZi and cobalt–chrome (CoCr)
as part of a three-arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Patients undergoing THA from four institutions were prospectively
randomised into three groups. Group A received a CoCr femoral head
and highly cross-linked polyethylene (XLPE) liner; Group B received
an OxZi femoral head and XLPE liner; Group C received an OxZi femoral
head and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) liner.
At five years, 368 patients had no statistically significant differences
in short-form-36 (p = 0.176 mental, p = 0.756 physical), Western
Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (p = 0.847),
pain scores
(p = 0.458) or complications. The mean rate of linear wear was 0.028
mm/year (standard deviation ( Cite this article:
