The purpose of the present study was to compare patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional surgical instrumentation (CSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in terms of early implant migration, alignment, surgical resources, patient outcomes, and costs. The study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 50 patients undergoing TKA. There were 25 patients in each of the PSI and CSI groups. There were 12 male patients in the PSI group and seven male patients in the CSI group. The patients had a mean age of 69.0 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare clinical
outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after manipulation under
anaesthesia (MUA) for post-operative stiffness with a matched cohort
of TKA patients who did not requre MUA. In total 72 patients (mean age 59.8 years, 42 to 83) who underwent
MUA following TKA were identified from our prospective database
and compared with a matched cohort of patients who had undergone
TKA without subsequent MUA. Patients were evaluated for range of
movement (ROM) and clinical outcome scores (Western Ontario and
McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Short-Form Health Survey,
and Knee Society Clinical Rating System) at a mean follow-up of
36.4 months (12 to 120). MUA took place at a mean of nine weeks
(5 to 18) after TKA. In patients who required MUA, mean flexion
deformity improved from 10° (0° to 25°) to 4.4° (0° to 15°) (p <
0.001),
and mean range of flexion improved from 79.8° (65° to 95°) to 116°
(80° to 130°) (p <
0.001). There were no statistically significant
differences in ROM or functional outcome scores at three months,
one year, or two years between those who required MUA and those
who did not. There were no complications associated with manipulation At most recent follow-up, patients requiring MUA achieved equivalent
ROM and clinical outcome scores when compared with a matched control
group. While other studies have focused on ROM after manipulation,
the current study adds to current literature by supplementing this
with functional outcome scores. Cite this article:
Obesity is an epidemic across both the developed
and developing nations that is possibly the most important current
public health factor affecting the morbidity and mortality of the global
population. Obese patients have the potential to pose several challenges
for arthroplasty surgeons from the standpoint of the influence obesity
has on osteoarthritic symptoms, their peri-operative medical management,
the increased intra-operative technical demands on the surgeon,
the intra- and post-operative complications, the long term outcomes
of total hip and knee arthroplasty. Also, there is no consensus
on the role the arthroplasty surgeon should have in facilitating
weight loss for these patients, nor whether obesity should affect
the access to arthroplasty procedures.
