A retrospective study was conducted to investigate
the changes in metal ion levels in a consecutive series of Birmingham
Hip Resurfacings (BHRs) at a minimum ten-year follow-up. We reviewed
250 BHRs implanted in 232 patients between 1998 and 2001. Implant
survival, clinical outcome (Harris hip score), radiographs and serum chromium
(Cr) and cobalt (Co) ion levels were assessed. Of 232 patients, 18 were dead (five bilateral BHRs), 15 lost
to follow-up and ten had been revised. The remaining 202 BHRs in
190 patients (136 men and 54 women; mean age at surgery 50.5 years
(17 to 76)) were evaluated at a minimum follow-up of ten years (mean
10.8 years (10 to 13.6)). The overall implant survival at 13.2 years
was 92.4% (95% confidence interval 90.8 to 94.0). The mean Harris
hip score was 97.7 (median 100; 65 to 100). Median and mean ion
levels were low for unilateral resurfacings (Cr: median 1.3 µg/l,
mean
1.95 µg/l (<
0.5 to 16.2); Co: median 1.0 µg/l, mean 1.62 µg/l
(<
0.5 to 17.3)) and bilateral resurfacings (Cr: median 3.2 µg/l,
mean 3.46 µg/l (<
0.5 to 10.0); Co: median 2.3 µg/l, mean 2.66
µg/l (<
0.5 to 9.5)). In 80 unilateral BHRs with sequential ion
measurements, Cr and Co levels were found to decrease significantly
(p <
0.001) from the initial assessment at a median of six years
(4 to 8) to the last assessment at a median of 11 years (9 to 13),
with a mean reduction of 1.24 µg/l for Cr and 0.88 µg/l for Co.
Three female patients had a >
2.5 µg/l increase of Co ions, associated with
head sizes ≤ 50 mm, clinical symptoms and osteolysis. Overall, there
was no significant difference in change of ion levels between genders
(Cr, p = 0.845; Co, p = 0.310) or component sizes (Cr, p = 0.505;
Co, p = 0.370). Higher acetabular component inclination angles correlated
with greater change in ion levels (Cr, p = 0.013; Co, p = 0.002).
Patients with increased ion levels had lower Harris hip scores (p
= 0.038). In conclusion, in well-functioning BHRs the metal ion levels
decreased significantly at ten years. An increase >
2.5 µg/l was
associated with poor function. Cite this article:
