A pragmatic multicentre randomized controlled trial, UK FROzen Shoulder Trial (UK FROST), was conducted in the UK NHS comparing the cost-effectiveness of commonly used treatments for adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care. A cost utility analysis from the NHS perspective was performed. Differences between manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic capsular release (ACR), and early structured physiotherapy plus steroid injection (ESP) in costs (2018 GBP price base) and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at one year were used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the treatments using regression methods.Aims
Methods
The aim of the Scaphoid Waist Internal Fixation for Fractures Trial (SWIFFT) was to determine the optimal treatment for adults with a bicortical undisplaced or minimally displaced fracture of the waist of the scaphoid, comparing early surgical fixation with initial cast immobilization, with immediate fixation being offered to patients with nonunion. A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to assess the relative merits of these forms of treatment. The differences in costs to the healthcare system and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of the patients over the one-year follow-up of the trial in the two treatment arms were estimated using regression analysis.Aims
Methods
Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip (MoMHR)
has enjoyed a resurgence in the last decade, but is now again in question
as a routine option for osteoarthritis of the hip. Proponents of
hip resurfacing suggest that its survival is superior to that of
conventional hip replacement (THR), and that hip resurfacing is
less invasive, is easier to revise than THR, and provides superior
functional outcomes. Our argument serves to illustrate that none
of these proposed advantages have been realised and new and unanticipated
serious complications, such as pseudotumors, have been associated
with the procedure. As such, we feel that the routine use of MoMHR
is not justified. Cite this article:
Satisfaction is increasingly employed as an outcome
measure for a successful total knee replacement (TKR). Satisfaction
as an outcome measure encompasses many different intrinsic and extrinsic
factors related to a person’s experience before and after TKR. The
Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry has previously demonstrated on
a large population study that 17% of TKR recipients are not satisfied
with their TKR outcome. This finding has been replicated in other
countries. Similar significant factors emerged from these registry
studies that are related to satisfaction. It would appear that satisfaction
is better after more chronic diseases and whether the TKR results
in pain relief or improved function. Importantly, unmet pre-operative
expectations are a significant predictor for dissatisfaction following
a TKR. It may be possible to improve rates by addressing the issues
surrounding pain, function and expectation before embarking on surgery. Cite this article:
