We compared the risks of re-revision and mortality between two-stage and single-stage revision surgeries among patients with infected primary hip arthroplasty. Patients with a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of their primary arthroplasty revised with single-stage or two-stage procedure in England and Wales between 2003 and 2014 were identified from the National Joint Registry. We used Poisson regression with restricted cubic splines to compute hazard ratios (HRs) at different postoperative periods. The total number of revisions and re-revisions undergone by patients was compared between the two strategies.Aims
Methods
With increasing burden of revision hip arthroplasty (THA), one of the major challenges is the management of proximal femoral bone loss associated with previous multiple surgeries. Proximal femoral arthroplasty (PFA) has already been popularized for tumour surgeries. Our aim was to describe the outcome of using PFA in these demanding non-neoplastic cases. A retrospective review of 25 patients who underwent PFA for non-neoplastic indications between January 2009 and December 2015 was undertaken. Their clinical and radiological outcome, complication rates, and survival were recorded. All patients had the Stanmore Implant – Modular Endo-prosthetic Tumour System (METS).Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with
metal-on-metal (MoM) arthroplasties of the hip have an increased
risk of cardiac failure compared with those with alternative types
of arthroplasties (non-MoM). A linkage study between the National Joint Registry, Hospital
Episodes Statistics and records of the Office for National Statistics
on deaths was undertaken. Patients who underwent elective total
hip arthroplasty between January 2003 and December 2014 with no
past history of cardiac failure were included and stratified as
having either a MoM (n = 53 529) or a non-MoM (n = 482 247) arthroplasty.
The primary outcome measure was the time to an admission to hospital
for cardiac failure or death. Analysis was carried out using data
from all patients and from those matched by propensity score.Aims
Patients and Methods
Current analysis of unicondylar knee replacements
(UKRs) by national registries is based on the pooled results of medial
and lateral implants. Consequently, little is known about the differential
performance of medial and lateral replacements and the influence
of each implant type within these pooled analyses. Using data from
the National Joint Registry for England and Wales (NJR) we aimed
to determine the proportion of UKRs implanted on the lateral side
of the knee, and their survival and reason for failure compared
with medial UKRs. By combining information on the side of operation
with component details held on the NJR, we were able to determine
implant laterality (medial
We report the long-term outcome of 218 Charnley low-friction arthroplasties in 141 patients who were 40 years old or younger at the time of surgery. The minimum follow-up was ten years with a mean of 16 years. The probability of the femoral component surviving 20 years was 86% and of the acetabular component, 84%. The chance that both components would survive for this period was 75%. The pathological diagnosis significantly influenced implant survival. In rheumatoid patients the probability of both components surviving at 20 years was 96% compared with 51% in patients with osteoarthritis. Clinical assessment of 103 patients (166 hips) in whom the arthroplasty was still functioning showed that 94% of hips had minimal pain or none. We conclude that in young patients cemented total hip replacement is a good procedure for those with rheumatoid arthritis but that the results are much less reliable in those with osteoarthritis.
A computer-based image analysis system has been developed as a research tool in total hip replacement. The system has been programmed to take multiple measurements from coronal plane radiographs. Poor quality radiographic images can be enhanced and standardised. The measurements which can be obtained include stem subsidence, cup migration, cup wear, and stem loosening. Reproducibility and accuracy were +/- 0.01 mm and +/- 0.5 mm respectively. The present application is in retrospective research, but prospective monitoring of radiographs is planned.
