The underlying natural history of suspected scaphoid fractures (SSFs) is unclear and assumed poor. There is an urgent requirement to develop the literature around SSFs to quantify the actual prevalence of intervention following SSF. Defining the risk of intervention following SSF may influence the need for widespread surveillance and screening of SSF injuries, and could influence medicolegal actions around missed scaphoid fractures. Data on SSF were retrospectively gathered from virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) across a large Scottish Health Board over a four-year period, from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2021. The Bluespier Electronic Patient Record System identified any surgical procedure being undertaken in relation to a scaphoid injury over the same time period. Isolating patients who underwent surgical intervention for SSF was performed by cross-referencing the unique patient Community Health Index number for patients who underwent these scaphoid procedures with those seen at VFCs for SSF over this four-year period.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to describe the introduction of a virtual pathway for the management of patients with a suspected fracture of the scaphoid, and to report patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and satisfaction following treatment using this service. All adult patients who presented with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture that was not visible on radiographs at the time of presentation during a one-year period were eligible for inclusion in the pathway. Demographic details, findings on examination, and routine four-view radiographs at the time of presentation were collected. All radiographs were reviewed virtually by a single consultant hand surgeon, with patient-initiated follow-up on request. PROMs were assessed at a minimum of one year after presentation and included the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH), the EuroQol five-dimension five-level health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), the Net Promoter Score (NPS), and return to work.Aims
Methods
The aim of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to
compare non-operative and operative management for acute isolated
displaced fractures of the olecranon in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Patients were randomised to either non-operative management or
operative management with either tension-band wiring or fixation
with a plate. They were reviewed at six weeks, three and six months
and one year after the injury. The primary outcome measure was the
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at one year.Aims
Patients and Methods
There is conflicting evidence about the functional
outcome and rate of satisfaction of super-elderly patients (≥ 80 years
of age) after carpal tunnel decompression. We compiled outcome data for 756 patients who underwent a carpal
tunnel decompression over an eight-year study period, 97 of whom
were super-elderly, and 659 patients who formed a younger control
group (<
80 years old). There was no significant difference between
the super-elderly patients and the younger control group in terms
of functional outcome according to the mean (0 to 100) QuickDASH
score (adjusted mean difference at one year 1.8; 95% confidence
interval (CI) -3.4 to 7.0) and satisfaction rate (odds ratio (OR)
0.78; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.58). Super-elderly patients were, however,
more likely to have thenar muscle atrophy at presentation (OR 9.2,
95% CI 5.8 to 14.6). When nerve conduction studies were obtained,
super-elderly patients were more likely to have a severe conduction deficit
(OR 12.4, 95% CI 3.0 to 51.3). Super-elderly patients report functional outcome and satisfaction
rates equal to those of their younger counterparts. They are more
likely to have thenar muscle atrophy and a severe nerve conduction
deficit at presentation, and may therefore warrant earlier decompression. Cite this article:
Diabetes mellitus is recognised as a risk factor
for carpal tunnel syndrome. The response to treatment is unclear,
and may be poorer than in non-diabetic patients. Previous randomised
studies of interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome have specifically
excluded diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to investigate
the epidemiology of carpal tunnel syndrome in diabetic patients,
and compare the outcome of carpal tunnel decompression with non-diabetic
patients. The primary endpoint was improvement in the QuickDASH
score. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 11.3% (176 of 1564).
Diabetic patients were more likely to have severe neurophysiological
findings at presentation. Patients with diabetes had poorer QuickDASH
scores at one year post-operatively (p = 0.028), although the mean
difference was lower than the minimal clinically important difference
for this score. After controlling for underlying differences in
age and gender, there was no difference between groups in the magnitude of
improvement after decompression (p = 0.481). Patients with diabetes
mellitus can therefore be expected to enjoy a similar improvement
in function.
