The aims of this network meta-analysis (NMA) were to examine nonunion rates and functional outcomes following various operative and nonoperative treatments for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures. Initial search strategy incorporated MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four treatment arms were created: nonoperative (NO); intramedullary nailing (IMN); reconstruction plating (RP); and compression/pre-contoured plating (CP). A Bayesian NMA was conducted to compare all treatment options for outcomes of nonunion, malunion, and function using the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Constant-Murley Shoulder Outcome scores.Aims
Methods
Recent improvements in surgical technique and perioperative blood management after total joint replacement (TJR) have decreased rates of transfusion. However, as many surgeons transition to outpatient TJR, obtaining routine postoperative blood tests becomes more challenging. Therefore, we sought to determine if a preoperative outpatient assessment tool that stratifies patients based on numerous medical comorbidities could predict who required postoperative haemoglobin (Hb) measurement. We performed a prospective study of consecutive unilateral primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and total hip arthroplasties (THAs) performed at a single institution. Prospectively collected data included preoperative and postoperative Hb levels, need for blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score.Aims
Methods
Aseptic loosening of the tibial component is a frequent cause of failure in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Management options include an isolated tibial revision or full component revision. A full component revision is frequently selected by surgeons unfamiliar with the existing implant or who simply wish to “start again”. This option adds morbidity compared with an isolated tibial revision. While isolated tibial revision has a lower morbidity, it is technically more challenging due to difficulties with exposure and maintaining prosthetic stability. This study was designed to compare these two reconstructive options. Patients undergoing revision TKA for isolated aseptic tibial loosening between 2012 and 2017 were identified. Those with revision implants or revised for infection, instability, osteolysis, or femoral component loosening were excluded. A total of 164 patients were included; 88 had an isolated tibial revision and 76 had revision of both components despite only having a loose tibial component. The demographics and clinical and radiological outcomes were recorded.Aims
Methods
We compared the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in obese
patients who previously underwent bariatric surgery and those who
did not, in a matched cohort study. There were 47 THAs in the bariatric group (42 patients), and
94 THAs in the comparison group (92 patients). The mean age of the
patients was 57 years in both groups (24 to 79) and 57% of the patients
in both groups were women. The mean time between bariatric surgery
and THA was five years (four months to 12 years) in the bariatric group.
The mean follow-up after THA was three years (2 to 9). Aims
Patients and Methods
Bariatric surgery has been advocated as a means
of reducing body mass index (BMI) and the risks associated with total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, this has not been proved clinically.
In order to determine the impact of bariatric surgery on the outcome
of TKA, we identified a cohort of 91 TKAs that were performed in
patients who had undergone bariatric surgery (bariatric cohort).
These were matched with two separate cohorts of patients who had not
undergone bariatric surgery. One was matched 1:1 with those with
a higher pre-bariatric BMI (high BMI group), and the other was matched
1:2 based on those with a lower pre-TKA BMI (low BMI group). In the bariatric group, the mean BMI before bariatric surgery
was 51.1 kg/m2 (37 to 72), which improved to 37.3 kg/m2 (24
to 59) at the time of TKA. Patients in the bariatric group had a
higher risk of, and worse survival free of, re-operation (hazard
ratio (HR) 2.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 6.2; p = 0.02)
compared with the high BMI group. Furthermore, the bariatric group
had a higher risk of, and worse survival free of re-operation (HR
2.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.3; p = 0.2) and revision (HR 2.2; 95% CI 1.1
to 6.5; p = 0.04) compared with the low BMI group. While bariatric surgery reduced the BMI in our patients, more
analysis is needed before recommending bariatric surgery before
TKA in obese patients. Cite this article:
