Cement-in-cement revision of the femoral component represents a widely practised technique for a variety of indications in revision total hip arthroplasty. In this study, we compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of two polished tapered femoral components. From our prospectively collated database, we identified all patients undergoing cement-in-cement revision from January 2005 to January 2013 who had a minimum of two years' follow-up. All cases were performed by the senior author using either an Exeter short revision stem or the C-Stem AMT high offset No. 1 prosthesis. Patients were followed-up annually with clinical and radiological assessment.Aims
Methods
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether an innovative
templating technique could predict the need for acetabular augmentation
during primary total hip arthroplasty for patients with dysplastic
hips. We developed a simple templating technique to estimate acetabular
component coverage at total hip arthroplasty, the True Cup: False
Cup (TC:FC) ratio. We reviewed all patients with dysplastic hips
who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between 2005 and 2012.
Traditional radiological methods of assessing the degree of acetabular dysplasia
(Sharp’s angle, Tönnis angle, centre-edge angle) as well as the
TC:FC ratio were measured from the pre-operative radiographs. A
comparison of augmented and non-augmented hips was undertaken to
determine any difference in pre-operative radiological indices between
the two cohorts. The intra- and inter-observer reliability for all
radiological indices used in the study were also calculated.Aims
Patients and Methods
