There has been a marked increase in the number of hip arthroscopies performed over the past 16 years, primarily in the management of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Insights into the pathoanatomy of FAI, and high-level evidence supporting the clinical effectiveness of arthroscopy in the management of FAI, have fuelled this trend. Arthroscopic management of labral tears with repair may have superior results compared with debridement, and there is now emerging evidence to support reconstructive options where repair is not possible. In situations where an interportal capsulotomy is performed to facilitate access, data now support closure of the capsule in selective cases where there is an increased risk of postoperative instability. Preoperative planning is an integral component of bony corrective surgery in FAI, and this has evolved to include computer-planned resection. However, the benefit of this remains controversial. Hip instability is now widely accepted, and diagnostic criteria and treatment are becoming increasingly refined. Instability can also be present with FAI or develop as a result of FAI treatment. In this annotation, we outline major current controversies relating to decision-making in hip arthroscopy for FAI. Cite this article:
Responsiveness and ceiling effects are key properties of an outcome score. No such data have been reported for the original English version of the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT-12) at a follow-up of more than four months. The aim of this study was to identify the responsiveness and ceiling effects of the English version iHOT-12 in a series of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for intra-articular hip pathology at a minimum of one year postoperatively. A total of 171 consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy with a diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) under the care of a single surgeon between January 2013 and March 2017 were included. iHOT-12 and EuroQol 5D-5L (EQ-5D-5L) scores were available pre- and postoperatively. Effect size and ceiling effects for the iHOT-12 were calculated with subgroup analysis.Aims
Methods
The aim was to compare long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after operative and nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture in the context of a randomized controlled trial. PROMs including the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D), satisfaction, net promoter score and data regarding re-rupture, and venous thromboembolic rates were collected for patients randomized to receive either operative or nonoperative treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture in a previous study. Of the 80 patients originally randomized, 64 (33 treated surgically, 31 nonoperatively) patients were followed up at a mean of 15.7 years (13.4 to 17.7).Aims
Methods
Although knee osteoarthritis (OA) is diagnosed and monitored radiologically, actual full-thickness cartilage loss (FTCL) has rarely been correlated with radiological classification. This study aims to analyze which classification system correlates best with FTCL and to assess their reliability. A prospective study of 300 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for OA (mean age 69 years (44 to 91; standard deviation (SD) 9.5), 178 (59%) female). Two blinded examiners independently graded preoperative radiographs using five common systems: Kellgren-Lawrence (KL); International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC); Fairbank; Brandt; and Ahlbäck. Interobserver agreement was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Intraoperatively, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) status and the presence of FTCL in 16 regions of interest were recorded. Radiological classification and FTCL were correlated using the Spearman correlation coefficient.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effect of
an enhanced recovery program (ERP) on the short-term functional
outcome after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Secondary outcomes included
its effect on rates of dislocation and mortality. Data were gathered on 1161 patients undergoing primary THA which
included 611 patients treated with traditional rehabilitation and
550 treated with an ERP. Aims
Patients and Methods
The pre-operative level of haemoglobin is the strongest predictor
of the peri-operative requirement for blood transfusion after total
knee arthroplasty (TKA). There are, however, no studies reporting
a value that could be considered to be appropriate pre-operatively. This study aimed to identify threshold pre-operative levels of
haemoglobin that would predict the requirement for blood transfusion
in patients who undergo TKA. Analysis of receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of
2284 consecutive patients undergoing unilateral TKA was used to
determine gender specific thresholds predicting peri-operative transfusion
with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity (area under
ROC curve 0.79 for males; 0.78 for females).Aims
Patients and Methods
This study demonstrates a significant correlation
between the American Knee Society (AKS) Clinical Rating System and
the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and provides a validated prediction
tool to estimate score conversion. A total of 1022 patients were prospectively clinically assessed
five years after TKR and completed AKS assessments and an OKS questionnaire.
Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated significant correlations between
OKS and the AKS knee and function scores but a stronger correlation
(r = 0.68, p <
0.001) when using the sum of the AKS knee and
function scores. Addition of body mass index and age (other statistically
significant predictors of OKS) to the algorithm did not significantly
increase the predictive value. The simple regression model was used to predict the OKS in a
group of 236 patients who were clinically assessed nine to ten years
after TKR using the AKS system. The predicted OKS was compared with
actual OKS in the second group. Intra-class correlation demonstrated
excellent reliability (r = 0.81, 95% confidence intervals 0.75 to
0.85) for the combined knee and function score when used to predict
OKS. Our findings will facilitate comparison of outcome data from
studies and registries using either the OKS or the AKS scores and
may also be of value for those undertaking meta-analyses and systematic
reviews. Cite this article:
