Patients infected with HIV presenting with an open fracture of a long bone are difficult to manage. There is an unacceptably high rate of post-operative infection after internal fixation. There are no published data on the use of external fixation in such patients. We compared the rates of pin-track infection in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients presenting with an open fracture. There were 47 patients with 50 external fixators, 13 of whom were HIV-positive (15 fixators).

There were significantly more pin-track infections requiring pharmaceutical or surgical intervention (Checketts grade 2 or greater) in the HIV-positive group (t-test, p = 0.001). The overall rate of severe pin-track infection in the HIV-positive patients requiring removal of the external-fixator pins was 7%. This contrasts with other published data which have shown higher rates of wound infection if open fractures are treated by internal fixation.

We recommend the use of external fixation for the treatment of open fractures in HIV-positive patients.

We performed a prospective, blind, controlled study on wound infection after implant surgery involving 41 procedures in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and 141 in HIV-negative patients. The patients were staged clinically and the CD4 cell count determined. Wound infection was assessed using the asepsis wound score. A risk category was allocated to account for presurgical contamination.

In HIV-positive patients, with no preoperative contamination, the incidence of wound infection (3.5%) was comparable with that of the HIV-negative group (5%; p = 0.396). The CD4 cell count did not affect the incidence of infection (r = 0.16). When there was preoperative contamination, the incidence of infection in HIV-positive patients increased markedly (42%) compared with that in HIV-negative patients (11%; p = 0.084).

Our results show that when no contamination has occurred implant surgery may be undertaken safely in HIV-positive patients.

The atlas of Greulich and Pyle for skeletal maturity and epiphyseal closure is widely used in many countries to assess skeletal age and to plan orthopaedic surgery. The data used to compile the atlas were collected from institutionalised American children in the 1950s.

In order to determine whether the atlas was relevant to subSaharan Africa, we compared skeletal age, according to the atlas, with chronological age in 139 skeletally immature Malawian children and young adults with an age range from 1 year 11 months to 28 years 5 months. The height and weight of each patient were also measured in order to calculate the body mass index.

The skeletal age of 119 patients (85.6%) was lower than the chronological age. The mean difference was 20.0 ± 24.1 months (t-test, p = 0.0049), and the greatest difference 100 months. The atlas is thus inaccurate for this group of children.

The body mass index in 131 patients was below the normal range of 20 to 25 kg/m².

The reasons for the low skeletal age in this group of children are discussed. Poor nutrition and chronic diseases such as malaria and diarrhoea which are endemic in Malawi are likely to be contributing factors. We did not find any correlation between the reduction in body mass index in our patients and the degree of retardation of skeletal age.