Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a bone-preserving treatment option for osteoarthritis localized to a single compartment in the knee. The success of the procedure is sensitive to patient selection and alignment errors. Robotic arm-assisted UKA provides technological assistance to intraoperative bony resection accuracy, which is thought to improve ligament balancing. This paper presents the five-year outcomes of a comparison between manual and robotically assisted UKAs. The trial design was a prospective, randomized, parallel, single-centre study comparing surgical alignment in patients undergoing UKA for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis (ISRCTN77119437). Participants underwent surgery using either robotic arm-assisted surgery or conventional manual instrumentation. The primary outcome measure (surgical accuracy) has previously been reported, and, along with secondary outcomes, were collected at one-, two-, and five-year timepoints. Analysis of five-year results and longitudinal analysis for all timepoints was performed to compare the two groups.Aims
Methods
This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group. A total of 139 patients were recruited from a single centre. Patients were randomised to receive either a manual UKA implanted with the aid of traditional surgical jigs, or a UKA implanted with the aid of a tactile guided robotic arm-assisted system. Outcome measures included the American Knee Society Score (AKSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score, Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, Short Form-12, Pain Catastrophising Scale, somatic disease (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders Score), Pain visual analogue scale, analgesic use, patient satisfaction, complications relating to surgery, 90-day pain diaries and the requirement for revision surgery.Objectives
Methods
To investigate the bone penetration of intravenous antibiotic
prophylaxis with flucloxacillin and gentamicin during hip and knee
arthroplasty, and their efficacy against Bone samples from the femoral head, neck and acetabulum were
collected from 18 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA)
and from the femur and tibia in 21 patients during total knee arthroplasty
(TKA). The concentration of both antibiotics in the samples was
analysed using high performance liquid chromatography. Penetration
was expressed as a percentage of venous blood concentration. The
efficacy against common infecting organisms was measured against
both the minimum inhibitory concentration 50, and the more stringent epidemiological
cutoff value for resistance (ECOFF).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to determine if a change
in antibiotic prophylaxis for routine hip and knee replacement was
associated with an increased risk of acute renal impairment. We identified 238 patients (128 knees and 110 hips) who had received
a single prophylactic dose of 1.5 g cefuroxime before joint replacement.
We compared them with prospectively collected data from 254 patients
(117 knees and 137 hips) who received a single prophylactic dose
of 2 g flucloxacillin and a height- and gender-determined dose of
gentamicin. The primary outcome measure was any new renal impairment
as graded by clinically validated criteria. We identified four patients (1.69%) in the cefuroxime group who
developed renal impairment. All four had mild impairment and all
renal function was normal by the third post-operative day. The incidence
of new-onset renal impairment was significantly higher in the flucloxacillin-and-gentamicin
group at 9.45% (24 patients) (p <
0.001). Three of these patients
remained with acute renal impairment after a week, although the
serum creatinine levels in all subsequently returned to normal. Cite this article:
The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of screening and successful treatment of methicillin-resistant We screened 5933 elective orthopaedic in-patients for MRSA at pre-operative assessment. Of these, 108 (1.8%) were colonised with MRSA and 90 subsequently underwent surgery. Despite effective eradication therapy, six of these (6.7%) had an SSI within one year of surgery. Among these infections, deep sepsis occurred in four cases (4.4%) and superficial infection in two (2.2%). The responsible organism in four of the six cases was MRSA. Further analysis showed that patients undergoing surgery for joint replacement of the lower limb were at significantly increased risk of an SSI if previously colonised with MRSA. We conclude that previously MRSA-colonised patients undergoing elective surgery are at an increased risk of an SSI compared with other elective patients, and that this risk is significant for those undergoing joint replacement of the lower limb. Furthermore, when an infection occurs, it is likely to be due to MRSA.
A case of bilateral myositis ossificans in the biceps femoris muscles causing a sciatic nerve palsy on the left side is described. Complete recovery of the sciatic nerve followed excision of the mass of ectopic bone. It is postulated that the patient's hobby of weight-lifting caused the ossification.
