Orientation of the acetabular component influences
wear, range of movement and the incidence of dislocation after total
hip replacement (THR). During surgery, such orientation is often
referenced to the anterior pelvic plane (APP), but APP inclination
relative to the coronal plane (pelvic tilt) varies substantially
between individuals. In contrast, the change in pelvic tilt from
supine to standing (dPT) is small for nearly all individuals. Therefore,
in THR performed with the patient supine and the patient’s coronal
plane parallel to the operating table, we propose that freehand placement
of the acetabular component placement is reliable and reflects standing
(functional) cup position. We examined this hypothesis in 56 hips
in 56 patients (19 men) with a mean age of 61 years (29 to 80) using
three-dimensional CT pelvic reconstructions and standing lateral
pelvic radiographs. We found a low variability of acetabular component
placement, with 46 implants (82%) placed within a combined range
of 30° to 50° inclination and 5° to 25° anteversion. Changing from
the supine to the standing position (analysed in 47 patients) was associated
with an anteversion change <
10° in 45 patients (96%). dPT was
<
10° in 41 patients (87%). In conclusion, supine THR appears
to provide reliable freehand acetabular component placement. In
most patients a small reclination of the pelvis going from supine
to standing causes a small increase in anteversion of the acetabular component Cite this article:
Large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacement has a failure rate of almost 8% at five years, three times the revision rate of conventional hip replacement. Unexplained pain remains a feature of this type of arthroplasty. All designs of the femoral component of large-head metal-on-metal total hip replacements share a unique characteristic: a subtended angle of 120° defining the proportion of a sphere that the head represents. Using MRI, we measured the contact area of the iliopsoas tendon on the femoral head in sagittal reconstruction of 20 hips of patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement. We also measured the articular extent of the femoral head on 40 normal hips and ten with cam-type deformities. Finally, we performed virtual hip resurfacing on normal and cam-type hips, avoiding overhang of the metal rim inferomedially. The articular surface of the femoral head has a subtended angle of 120° anteriorly and posteriorly, but only 100° medially. Virtual surgery in a normally shaped femoral head showed a 20° skirt of metal protruding medially where iliopsoas articulates. The excessive extent of the large-diameter femoral components may cause iliopsoas impingement independently of the acetabular component. This may be the cause of postoperative pain with these implants.
