This study describes the variation in the annual volumes of revision hip arthroplasty (RHA) undertaken by consultant surgeons nationally, and the rate of accrual of RHA and corresponding primary hip arthroplasty (PHA) volume for new consultants entering practice. National Joint Registry (NJR) data for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man were received for 84,816 RHAs and 818,979 PHAs recorded between April 2011 and December 2019. RHA data comprised all revision procedures, including first-time revisions of PHA and any subsequent re-revisions recorded in public and private healthcare organizations. Annual procedure volumes undertaken by the responsible consultant surgeon in the 12 months prior to every index procedure were determined. We identified a cohort of ‘new’ HA consultants who commenced practice from 2012 and describe their rate of accrual of PHA and RHA experience.Aims
Methods
The burden of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) continues to grow. The surgery is complex and associated with significant costs. Regional rTHA networks have been proposed to improve outcomes and to reduce re-revisions, and therefore costs. The aim of this study was to accurately quantify the cost and reimbursement for a rTHA service, and to assess the financial impact of case complexity at a tertiary referral centre within the NHS. A retrospective analysis of all revision hip procedures was performed at this centre over two consecutive financial years (2018 to 2020). Cases were classified according to the Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) and whether they were infected or non-infected. Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade ≥ III or BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2 are considered “high risk” by the RHCC. Costs were calculated using the Patient Level Information and Costing System (PLICS), and remuneration based on Healthcare Resource Groups (HRG) data. The primary outcome was the financial difference between tariff and cost per patient episode.Aims
Methods
The aim of this modified Delphi process was to create a structured Revision Hip Complexity Classification (RHCC) which can be used as a tool to help direct multidisciplinary team (MDT) discussions of complex cases in local or regional revision networks. The RHCC was developed with the help of a steering group and an invitation through the British Hip Society (BHS) to members to apply, forming an expert panel of 35. We ran a mixed-method modified Delphi process (three rounds of questionnaires and one virtual meeting). Round 1 consisted of identifying the factors that govern the decision-making and complexities, with weighting given to factors considered most important by experts. Participants were asked to identify classification systems where relevant. Rounds 2 and 3 focused on grouping each factor into H1, H2, or H3, creating a hierarchy of complexity. This was followed by a virtual meeting in an attempt to achieve consensus on the factors which had not achieved consensus in preceding rounds.Aims
Methods
We investigated whether the indentation of bone
cement spacers used in revision of infected joint arthroplasty with a
MacDonald dissector increased the elution of antibiotic The fluid sampled at 72 hours from the indented discs containing
0.17 g gentamicin (0.88% w/w) contained a mean of 113 mcg/ml (90.12
to 143.5) compared with 44.5 mcg/ml (44.02 to 44.90) in the fluid
sampled from the plain discs (p = 0.012). In discs containing 0.33
g gentamicin (1.75% w/w), the concentration eluted from the indented discs
at 72 hours was a mean of 316 mcg/ml (223 to 421) compared with
a mean of 118 mcg/ml (100 to 140) from the plain discs (p <
0.001). At two weeks, these significant differences persisted. At nine
weeks the indented discs eluted a greater concentration for all
gentamicin doses, but the difference was only significant for the
discs containing 0.17 g (0.88% w/w, p = 0.006). However if the area
under the curve is taken as a measure of the total antibiotic eluted,
the indented discs eluted more gentamicin than the plain discs for
the 0.17 g (0.88% w/w, p = 0.031), the 0.25 g (1.41% w/w, p <
0.001) and the 0.33 g (1.75% w/w, p <
0.001) discs. When preparing antibiotic spacers for use in staged revision
arthroplasty surgery we recommend indenting the spacer with a MacDonald
dissector to increase the elution of antibiotic. Cite this article:
