Patients undergoing limb reconstruction surgery often face a challenging and lengthy process to complete their treatment journey. The majority of existing outcome measures do not adequately capture the patient-reported outcomes relevant to this patient group in a single measure. Following a previous systematic review, the Stanmore Limb Reconstruction Score (SLRS) was designed with the intent to address this need for an effective instrument to measure patient-reported outcomes in limb reconstruction patients. We aim to assess the face validity of this score in a pilot study. The SLRS was designed following structured interviews with several groups including patients who have undergone limb reconstruction surgery, limb reconstruction surgeons, specialist nurses, and physiotherapists. This has subsequently undergone further adjustment for language and clarity. The score was then trialled on ten patients who had undergone limb reconstruction surgery, with subsequent structured questioning to understand the perceived suitability of the score.Aims
Methods
The management of a significant bony defect following excision
of a diaphyseal atrophic femoral nonunion remains a challenge. We
present the outcomes using a combined technique of acute femoral
shortening, stabilized with a long retrograde intramedullary nail,
accompanied by bifocal osteotomy compression and distraction osteogenesis with
a temporary monolateral fixator. Eight men and two women underwent the ‘rail and nail’ technique
between 2008 and 2016. Proximal locking of the nail and removal
of the external fixator was undertaken once the length of the femur
had been restored and prior to full consolidation of the regenerate.Aims
Patients and Methods
Patients undergoing femoral lengthening by external fixation
tolerate treatment less well when compared to tibial lengthening.
Lengthening of the femur with an intramedullary device may have
advantages. We reviewed all cases of simple femoral lengthening performed
at our unit from 2009 to 2014. Cases of nonunions, concurrent deformities,
congenital limb deficiencies and lengthening with an unstable hip
were excluded, leaving 33 cases (in 22 patients; 11 patients had
bilateral procedures) for review. Healing index, implant tolerance
and complications were compared.Aims
Patients and Methods
